Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-07-19/Features and admins

I just wanted to state again about how much I like this format. This feature has gone from being scan-worthy to being worth a thorough read. Great job, folks! - BanyanTree 15:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

I've skipped reading the Signpost for weeks because watching the FAC page is about the same thing. This touch is now more interesting. I'm impressed. --Moni3 (talk) 15:34, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

I can only echo the above. It's flipped from being a boring list to something I can be entertained by. On a side note, I read Tarrare because of this, and I fully agree that "cat lovers may want to give this one a miss". — Ed   (talk  •  majestic titan)  00:11, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Wow. I have to agree, it looks awesome. I never had a problem with the old format, I always read it and didn't think there was anything wrong with it, but that didn't mean it couldn't still be improved, and this is definitely an improvement. -- &oelig; &trade; 07:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Indeed, seresin has been doing a very good job on this for about three years, I think. This expands and modifies the structure he established. Tony   (talk)  08:21, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I'd prefer that we continue to show all of the new featured pictures. --Tagishsimon (talk) 10:45, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * What, all 23? Tony   (talk)  04:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The old style was cluttered and conveyed the FP promotions in a way that was not aesthetically pleasing, something which FPs are meant to be. The old design where the images were pulled together in small thumbnails was a bit of a slap in the face to the reason they were promoted.  Wacky Wace  you talkin' to me? 12:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Great job on the new format. May you could add a link to a google image search that somehow shows the weeks latest FPs. Their image search has recently been upgraded. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 16:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)