Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-04-25/Technology report


 * SMW sounds exciting. I can foresee Wikipedia being twice as useful in the future. There's still so much room for expansion yet to come, providing future as well as existing editors with new opportunities to improve Wikipedia. -- &oelig; &trade; 01:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It is very useful (using it to reduce duplication of information is an obvious application, but barely even begins to scratch the surface - you really start to appreciate what can be done with it when you start using it to check page names and the like), but there's also a lot of room for improvement, in my experience at least. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 04:18, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It would be a free alternative to Wolfram Alpha and it would solve the problems with categories, page titles etc. --Chricho ∀ (talk) 12:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The 404 error bug seems to have the wrong number. I couldn't find the correct one. Someone please fix that. --Waldir talk 12:39, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Sorry. - Jarry1250 [Who? Discuss.] 18:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)