Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-05-16/Features and admins

To anyone wondering how a topic with only 3/13 articles featured is a "featured topic"- it's not. It's a Good Topic, as less than 50% of the articles are featured. -- Pres N  01:45, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, fixed. I was just too bleary-eyed when doing this page to realise I'd chosen the wrong one, which had already been mistakenly omitted last week. I must say, I just cannot work out how to tell featured from good topics in the templates on the nomination page: what confused me was the bronze star against the top-billed article. An associated issue is that no distinction is made between the component featured and good articles and featured and good lists; they're all treated as FAs. What's the secret to both? Tony   (talk)  14:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, like what PresN said, if a topic has articles that are 50% featured, its a featured topic. Less than 50%, it a good topic. Probably be a good idea to look at the talk page to really see if its good or featured. GamerPro64  16:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * This page requires a huge amount of hum-drum work each week. I'm putting in a request that closers specify whether a new FT is featured or good, so I don't have to use a calculator on each template. This job needs to be as streamlined as possible. :-)  Tony   (talk)  16:12, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Am I the only one to find it ironic that Sarek, right after being re-confirmed, has been blocked by another admin? -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Heh, it certainly raised my eyebrow.. -- &oelig; &trade; 12:57, 18 May 2011 (UTC)