Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-02-20/Technology report


 * I'd just like to say again that (tho I know NOTHING about this technical stuff) I really appreciate this section and think Jarry1250 writes so that even I can sort of understand what's going on. Thanks! MathewTownsend (talk) 13:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * A thank you to both you and Sumana for your comments (last week and this) - I always like to hear from readers, as, I'm sure, do other Signpost writers. Constructive criticism is also always appreciated, as are factual corrections (from those who know better than me) and just general suggestions - I'm all ears. Regards, - Jarry1250 [Deliberation needed] 00:29, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * It all depends on the section methinks; Tech, ITN, and N&N generally have discussions about what's up, whereas the Discussion report and the Arbitration report tend to dissolve into "this is inflammatory", "this isn't neutral", "this word is inappropriate", so on and so forth...Res Mar 03:15, 23 February 2012 (UTC)