Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-04-23/Arbitration report


 * I don't know much about the Rich Farmbrough case or its history, but when someone suggests retroactively changing the case, I get concerned. What possible reason could there be to suggest such a thing?  If there's a serious problem, you cblank it.  If there's only a minor problem, you ignore it.  I'm just trying to make sense of this.  Can anyone else enlighten me?  -- N  Y  Kevin  @081, i.e. 00:56, 25 April 2012 (UTC)