Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-09-03/Op-ed

Hi, peanut gallery here: Unless there is a normalised version of that graph, it will be not very useful, as the absolute values cannot be compared between categories. Also, its not fair to make comparisons akin to: "1 in 3 people thought apple was aweome, but 2 in 3 people thought orange was OK." 46.115.17.33 (talk) 17:14, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * - thanks. Szhang (WMF) (talk) 18:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

On my monitor the words on the image(when zoomed in) are not readable without a magnifying glass. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 12:43, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Here ya go. Rich Farmbrough, 20:30, 4 September 2012 (UTC).


 * I've uploaded a higher resolution graph - I hope this helps. Steven   Zhang  Help resolve disputes! 05:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

I can't agree anymore that the biggest problem with resolving disputes is that I have no idea where to go. If I had a dispute I would've clicked around on blue links for "are you in the right place", if not here's five other places you might want to check out. Ugh. Dan653 (talk) 02:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, yes, but we need to think from the perspective of someone that's not too familiar with the system. Steven   Zhang  Help resolve disputes! 00:57, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I just had a great outcome that solved all my problems, so it works at least some of the time. MathewTownsend (talk) 00:37, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Those who "win" a dispute tend to rate the resolution process more favorably than those who lose. It is extremely difficult for most people to separate their opinion of the quality of a process from their opinion of the result.—Finell 21:10, 7 November 2012 (UTC)