Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-02-18/In the media

Please note that while Jayen466 authored most of this piece, the "In brief" item on the two Register articles were [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikipedia_Signpost%2F2013-02-18%2FIn_the_media&diff=539192491&oldid=539192354 authored and added] by me. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 07:33, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * It's good forethought for you to note that. And a shame it needs to be done :-( . -- Seth Finkelstein (talk) 02:24, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Secrecy of correspondence is a "human right" and a foundation of a democracy. If it get holes, then there is a free path to tyranny, martial law, coup d'etat and absolute power. Of course, it would kill Wikipedia too. BTW, U.S. Postal Service and its snail mail is worth to be defended too. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 12:26, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Kill Wikipedia? Do we operate secretly? Jim.henderson (talk) 11:40, 23 February 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Our nicknames protect us a lil bit against harassment
 * 2) Nowadays, pharisaism (destructive harassment by lawyers) is a problem
 * 3) Wikipedia is truth, neutral point-of-view and voluntary work
 * 4) Tyranny (slavery) is media control (censorship) and paid propaganda (paid editing)
 * 5) Of course, reality is fifty shades of grey :o)
 * 6) Regards --Chris.urs-o (talk) 05:17, 24 February 2013 (UTC)