Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-05-06/In the media


 * He used a Commons image File:Knights Templar Cross.svg on the cover of his manifesto... (Surprised that he didn't pick up on the Turkish Abductions.) -- AnonMoos (talk) 21:27, 10 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The best inaccuracies from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/10030060/Wikipedia-you-dont-get-to-decide-whos-interesting.html:
 * "there is a sort of committee deciding what should be preserved for prosperity, and what should be thrown into the wastepaper bin of cyber-space."
 * "her Wikipedia page has been deleted by the shadowy figures at governing body Wikimedia"
 * strongly implying it was her English Wikipedia page
 * Wikipedia referred to as "wiki" in the dek of the article
 *  — PinkAmpers  &#38;  ( Je vous invite à me parler )  04:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Link to Reuters article on Sarah Sterch is giving a 404 "Page not found" (from UK, in case that's relevant). Pam  D  07:05, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * A Google search shows that the url in the article is (or was) correct. Unfortunately, even the cached version of the page isn't functional. And while the trust.org internal search engine shows that article as a search result, clicking on the result, to go to the article itself, produces the same 404 error. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 15:43, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Well spotted, both of you. As far as I recall, the text was identical to that on womensenews.org. Andreas JN 466 04:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)