Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-10-22/WikiProject report


 * If we required all new articles to be created from a red link, there would be very few orphans in the first place. (Doesn't help the existing orphans, but can prevent making the problem worse). Kerry (talk) 10:28, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Its a slippery slope. If we required all articles to have categories, we'd have less articles needing categories, etc.--Milowent • hasspoken  15:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Scarily describing "a huge task" in the headline may be off-putting. While there are indeed a lot of such articles, de-orphaning a single article is a small task, and ideally suited to those with small amounts of free time, or those making tentative first contributions. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:43, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, you can always edit the title if you feel you want to - this is a wiki.  Rcsprinter123    (commune)  @ 11:57, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * We want people to read these articles too, i would have preferred "Project may be drowned by orphans unless you help now!!" but they didn't ask me. :-) --Milowent • hasspoken  15:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Glad to read this report -- didn't even know about this worthy project!--Milowent • hasspoken 15:05, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations, de-orphaners!

 * Evidently, there is much, much more activity on this project than is apparent at first glance. In just one category alone, Category:Orphaned articles from February 2009, the month that articles were tagged by a bot, the backlog has been reduced by 90,000 articles !!! It was at 114,437 in 1 March 2009, and today, 26 October 2014, it's down to 24,940.
 * Congratulations, de-orphaners! -- Djembayz (talk) 21:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)