Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2016-08-18/In the media


 * If you reverse the first two words such as "The bad, the ugly, the playful, and the promising" it would be a tetracolon crescens (four parts in increasing magnitude of syllables). -- Green  C  19:10, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I found the Tom Mendelsohn article on Ars Technica to be an entertaining read, and a curious reflection on the overly sensitive age in which we live. Praemonitus (talk) 19:25, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I enjoyed the article as well, but I'm not sure I understand your comment. Do I understand your statement that we (humanity) are too sensitive? Ckoerner (talk) 16:21, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I too was unsure of the meaning there. Was it meant that Tom Mendelsohn was too sensitive about the Wikipedia article's content? If there were a WP article about me, I would not want it to say untrue stuff about me. But there isn't anything overly sensitive about feeling that way; rather, it's the rational amount of sensitivity! Quercus solaris (talk) 23:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Note that Wikiverse is by the same main author as Wikigalaxy, Owen Cornec. He makes good things. :-) (Also, there are related discussions/proposals at m:Grants:Project/Arc.heolo.gy and Wikimedia User Interface/Concepts/Explorer and mw:User:Quiddity/Tree of knowledge). Quiddity (talk) 22:06, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Backchannel has some high-quality pieces. Thanks! And a request—please stop giving Cracked traffic czar  19:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I second that notion from Czar. It's just not a website worth talking about. GamerPro64  20:11, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The Vice article is so absurd that I came away thinking that I had wasted three minutes of my life trying to read it. As an American, I would like to undertstand the UKIP better, but this didn't help. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  05:45, 28 August 2016 (UTC)