Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2019-02-28/Gallery


 * This piece was a neat idea; the signatures we see communicate individuality that make us real people, not just machines. I will point out that my favorite signature has always been 's. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 11:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Golly, this year has started off with a bang for my Wikipedia Signature Gallery!


 * First a mention in last month's Signpost (The Collective Consciousness of Admin Userpages) and now this month somebody copied nearly the whole darned thing?!?


 * The signature gallery project probably self-taught me as much about html markup and wikipedia editing details as any article I wrote. I started it on my talk page, of all places, trying the patience of some experienced editors at the time (first six sigs in November 2006).


 * What the heck, anyway, here's another doozy, what's not to love? – Athaenara  ✉  13:04, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * While I'm responsible for the Gallery in my user space and "authored" it, I did not have anything to do with this Signpost page. I think it was a bit much, to put it mildly: a section or two with some commentary about why Bri thought it was worthy of Signpost inclusion would have been more interesting.  But this is Wikipedia, where the editing never stops: hey, Bri, it's not to late to pare it down!  – Athaenara  ✉  05:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * "By Athaenara" in the byline really bothered me, so I removed it (diff). – Athaenara  ✉  23:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)


 * While all of these signatures are lovely, I've always been a fan for the good ole classic default one. Can't beat a classic. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Anyone "flying" an image (not emoji) flag is violating Signatures. We shouldn't create a fancy gallery for these. Furthermore, I dislike the idea of adding fancy colors and HTML tags to a signature. If someone has something important to say, the arguments should stand out, not the signature. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:38, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * That reminds me, It is now almost ten years since we have had a Request for signatureship, at the time, mine was suggestion number 5. I'm not sure where that would fit in the article above.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  23:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Side point, but if you're a killjoy like me who prefers not to see custom signatures, there is: this script which transforms everything to a uniform style when you view. --LukeSurlt c 09:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * In one poll, there was no opposition, but just before the final conclusion and the formal consensus was reached, one of the agreeing voters crossed out his vote and registered a dissenting vote. He was asked: Now that you have broken the consensus, at least explain why you changed your mind? - The user honestly replied: Honestly, I did not change my mind, I just changed my signature and could not find another place to try it! Arbabi second (talk) 11:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC)