Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2019-05-31/Discussion report

Surprise me about admin corruption. Tony (talk)  01:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

, thank you very much for this summary. The azwiki proposal page has reached a size that, combined with the chaotic history, makes this Signpost article a welcome overview. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you and The Signpost for this excellent summary. I think it effectively lays out some reasonably contentious debates both locally and globally. StudiesWorld (talk) 10:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Great summary.-- Vulp here  13:33, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

I'm not surprised about this corruption at all. Many people are made about corrupt administrators, illegally blocking and threatening people. All corrupt administrators should be fired! If I had it my way administrators should be required to renew their position every year. I think that would help to weed out corrupt administrators.Catfurball (talk) 18:50, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 * While I wouldn’t have the renewals quite so often (because it'd get a bit inefficient, maybe 1.5-2 years?), I support your idea. Remagoxer (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2019 (UTC)