Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2019-07-31/Gallery


 * Missed these somehow. Really spectacular additions to Commons. Thanks for highlighting them here. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 16:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Excellent images. Definitely worthy of a WP:FPC nomination as a set, if they can find stable usage in articles. I've nominated the Denali one for FP on Commons, they are all worthy of the title. Also Heinrich C. Berann is a red link. MER-C 18:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Did I mention that these come in 2 versions, with and without labels. All the unlabeled panoramas have been uploaded, but only one with labels IIRC. The ones with labels might be the better ones to use in articles. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 18:46, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Just one word, beautiful... Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 19:29, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I've uploaded the remaining unlabelled images. MER-C 20:26, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * These amazing pictures do not appear (to my eye) to be photographs, although they seem to have as much detail as a photograph would have (or more). How were they made? JRSpriggs (talk) 10:32, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * They are definitely paintings. I wish I had more solid info on how they were painted, but with the files at this high resolution you can see for yourself the tiniest details, you can see the brushstrokes. I'll suggest looking at the Yellowstone panorama at the highest resolution and moving your view toward the middle (below the lake). It looks like each individual tree is painted. The trees are not realistic at this level, but they do look something like trees and are each unique.  I've never tried to describe brushstrokes before, but I'll call these "disciplined", rather than - as I imagine much modern art brushstrokes would be described - "inspired", "whimsical", "spectacular." You can also tell that the panoramas aren't photos in the overviews by looking at the clouds.  There are very realistic clouds that feature in 3 of the paintings, but somehow they never get in the way of the scenery. A photographer would never have that kind of luck, no matter how many photos they took.
 * Now for some speculation. How could he have put this much information into a painting? I imagine he'd have to 1) visit the scene over the course of weeks or months, just get a feel for the place, 2) have somebody take a dozen or so aerial photos, 3) work with detailed geological maps with altitudes given. And that's just to get the information needed. How to actually record that information in one painting? I don't know, but I can guess that spending a career of 50-60 years mostly just painting mountain scenes had a lot to do with it. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 13:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Check out the pen-and-ink work of Erwin Raisz. Another gifted artist–cartographer. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:19, 2 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Nominated for featured picture status: Featured picture candidates/Heinrich C. Berann NPS panoramas. MER-C 15:15, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for highlighting these jewels of geography here! -- Just N. (talk) 14:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)