Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2020-06-28/In focus


 * If you have been working on any LGBTIQ+ articles this month, we invite you ro receive Wiki Loves Pride photo postcards.--Pharos (talk) 19:58, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has been... tonedeaf about LGBT issues in the past - Arguments for keeping Chelsea Manning on her deadname; and, further back, problematic deletion of user categories and infoboxes related to LGBT issues in 2007. It's doing better, but one can state the most appalling homophobic/transphobic comments in a deletion argument and never get the slightest bit of backlash - see Talk:Chelsea_Manning/Archive_16, so I'm not sure how much it's there. Should there be blocks for such things? I don't know, but it does strike me that, as it is, there's basically no consequences. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.2% of all FPs 22:48, 28 June 2020 (UTC)