Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2020-12-28/Op-Ed


 * It's also been a year where for the first time Wikimania did not take place (with current restrictions now extended until March, it's unlikely to  take place in  2021 either). But  it's also  been a year  in which  due to  COVID-19 the WMF has made significant  savings on  staff  travel that  may demonstrate just how unnecessary many of those 'business trips' are.  With  the increased level of homeworking, it  might  also  reveal just  how important it  might  not  be after all  for  the WMF to maintain a headquarters in  one of the most  expensive places on  the planet.
 * I'll give no guarantee of accuracy in  my  figures that  follow, I'm no statistician, but COVID-19 might  uncover a lot  about  the  expenditure that  volunteer users have taken for  granted as being  necessary - in 2006 when I joined, there were five employees for  1,560,000 articles (in the English Wikipedia) and about $2.7 million in revenue, today there are only  4 times more articles but now over 450  employees and the WMF is still  hiring. . The Wikimedia Foundation's total revenue for fiscal year 2018-2019 was US $118.6 million, an increase of 4296.30%.
 * The number of (theoretically) WMF owned projects may have grown considerably, and the number of articles from volunteer contributions in the encyclopedias may have increased (but no longer exponentially), forcing an increase in the server capacity (and the many costly moves and locations of its data centres) but  if by  2019 13% ($15,418,000) of  the funds go  on 'Administration and governance',
 * All I can suggest  is that  some of the savings brought  about  by COVID-19 could be carried over and put  to  better use for  the direct support  of the volunteers than heretofore. Like - just  for  example - making  the next Wikimania the biggest and best  ever for  the volunteers - and getting it right for once. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:06, 29 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Hey Mr. Kudpung, do you really really think that any Wikimania world meeting of some hundreds/thousand priviliged people to party for Wikipedia's sake makes any difference at all? You are a most critical guy as for WMF but in misjudging of all things a Wikimania as deserving the highest grades of luxury (really?) you are certainly underperforming. Try again with another approach? -- Well you 're right we have a WMF that has got more fundraised millions than good ideas to spend it for community quality developments. And just like the WMF Bingo table states: it's a shame when there could be actually WMF staff members that have no clue in community needs b/c not having any own editing stats and no own conflict experiences with vandals and with own referencing problems. Not one of them should be hired without at least 2000 edits of good quality and at least one year of continuously editing a chosen field of serious wikipedia cooperation works verification before application for employment. The focus of WMF staff members should be supporting the basis workers and to do this they need to know the field work and the practical problems that occur there. Of course, most of them might be personally quite nice persons, no doubt. But if they don't focus on being "Service staff" but instead dream of becoming managers, rich and powerful like in any other corporations we can't afford those career sluggards. That's a strategic mission of 2021: How to win back and repower WMF managements 'grip on reality' /'road adherence' about Wikipedia basic workers' needs? No Wikimania will help anything for that goal. Just parties for international upper-class offsprings who can afford the flight expenses. Serious staff members who visit local basis work meetings are a much better idea. --Just N. (talk) 00:26, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Perhaps try again in your native German,, because your first three sentences don't make any sense to me. (Don't worry, my German is as good as yours). Frohes neues Jahr!🙂 Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:26, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Rosefeather of WindClan (talk) 01:19, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm torn between hating this year and loving it; my grandpas died, but I also discovered the heaven that is Wikipedia.

Hooray! That most bitter Covid burdened year 2020 is gone, gone, is past now! But the Covid pandemia blues is still with us as the restrictions will remain. I long for some life quality provided by live concerts and theatre performances to become possible again. And no way that online music shows etc could be an adequate replacement. Wikipedia editing sometimes helps to forget about the low cultural quality of life for a short while. Corona Blues you are the ugly ghost of 2020! And we still can't get rid of you except in our most private relationships. --Just N. (talk) 00:26, 1 January 2021 (UTC)


 * This is quite a year. As Reddit puts it out, 2020 is a burning tire colorized by an out-of-tune choir, but nevertheless, it's a beautiful year. I've got stories to tell to my grandkids in the ensuing decades.  Gerald WL  13:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * "Interesting" stories, as in the the legendary Chinese proverb. - Bri.public (talk) 16:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)