Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2021-11-29/Arbitration report


 * The report says the case against RexxS accumulated 43 preliminary statements. One of these was SlimVirgin's statement to not accept the case. Newyorkbrad declined (early). Other voices requesting to avoid a case: Hammersoft, Black Kite, Johnuniq, Tom.Reding, Folly Mox, Deepfriedokra, Montanabw, Volunteer Marek, Ched, Atsme, Tryptofish, Sluzzelin, Jehochman, Johnbod, Moneytrees, and Kudpung.Also: RexxS, and made , while the case was filed on 27 February. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * This year's Arbcom is possibly one of the best in recent years, but as Arbcoms go, it still has a long way to go to becoming a just tribunal. RexxS's comment on 's TP is elegant, accurate, and totally to the point. While his absence is a great loss to Wikipedia, he has my greatest respect for quitting the way he did. It could not have been easy. If ever I am able to visit the UK again, it will be a bee-line for nearby Brum and a beer or several with RexxS. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:16, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Small correction, at least I think: My understanding was that the ECP restriction isn't quite the same as the 500/30 restriction, since admins can grant EC to accounts manually. Or am I misremembering? --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 00:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Great article . A perfect mix of detail and summary. Very informative. Well done. – Novem Linguae (talk) 06:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm in the Signpost 8) &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 07:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Those numbers in the Enforcement actions table look suspicious. The lines for AP2 and BLP are almost identical. Is that correct? --rchard2scout (talk) 14:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)