Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia in webcomics

Does this count?
A Wikirant by Ozy and Millie. I'm hesitant to list it, though, as "the Webcomics Choice Awards Award Ceremony 2007" isn't really a "webcomic." ... OR IS IT? --210.49.99.248 16:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * ... where "Ozy and Millie" is redefined as "characters from Dandy and Company". &mdash;Tamfang 04:40, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Table format
I decided to read all of these, and it was actually rather hard to find which bit to click on to get to read the actual comic. I standardized the rows as DATE, Name of Webcomic(link),Comic Strip Title(link),Summary. I really think this should be in straight tabular columns, but if anyone has better ideas great. It wouldn't be hard to put in month anchors again if people really want them, now that the date is in the first column, but I thought they were annoying. Having the text here clearly summarize the specific Wikipedia issue explored is helpful for a number of reasons, but in particular it helps as a double-check of whether we should bother mentioning the comic in this particular list. Metaeducation 13:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

date needed
I want to add a citation for a strip from the webcomic Unspeakable Vault (of Doom), but can't tell the date of it. This is the cite:

--Auric (talk) 17:54, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * So we add an Undated section. Why the nowiki?  —Tamfang (talk) 00:25, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I contribute using a dial-up connection and a slow computer. I did this so someone who wanted to copy the cite could do so without clicking on [edit] and having to wait. This usually takes me 3-5 minutes (more if the browser freezes). --Auric (talk) 18:27, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

permanent red ink
Is there, or was there ever, a good reason for the dates to be "linked"? —Tamfang (talk) 13:16, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

one we missed
wikipedia vs youtube.©Geni (talk) 03:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Is this admin or content ?
The page is currently in the Wikipedia namespace which is for Wikipedia administration pages. However, the page is also in a category that's for articles (encyclopedic content). It could be moved into article namspace (e.g. like Wikipedia in culture) or it could have the article category removed (e.g. like Wikipedia in video games). Thoughts ? DexDor (talk) 10:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC)