Wikipedia talk:Wikipedians by number of edits (July 2003)

Should this article be Wikipedians by number of edits by month instead? -- Ram-Man 22:41, Aug 13, 2003 (UTC)


 * I like this page! It gives a clearer view of who is currently active, rather than mixing up people who have been active at different stages of Wikipedia's history. Thanks for making it. So are we getting a new page every month? If so, I expect that Wikipedians by number of edits by month would be the index page for them, and then the individual monthly pages would be at... oh, I don't know. This is the debate on what to call the pages for the annual presidential elections all over again, and I'm not sure we ever came to a consensus on that... -- Oliver P. 15:36, 16 Aug 2003 (UTC)


 * I think I'll just make individual articles each month until someone decides what to do with it. I kind of like the idea of keeping all of the different ones around so we can compare months. -- Ram-Man 16:54, Aug 16, 2003 (UTC)


 * Yes, that is easier than having one page, with older months in the page history. So the month must be in the title, Wikipedians by number of edits in July 2003 is perhaps better, to avoid ambiguity (Wikipedia talk:Wikipedians by number of edits (July 2003) could mean up to). - Patrick 21:08, 22 Sep 2003 (UTC)