Wikipedia talk:Winningest

Justification?
How is this essay justified? The discussion at the MoS in no way supports the opening line. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 12:00, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

This essay rocks!
Seeing that it is based on previous consensus and is quite clear, I think there is no choice but to avoid using the (shit)word winningest ! Yeah! All is good in the world again. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 12:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Wow, I suspected you were a troll—and now we have all the evidence. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 12:45, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You have the evidence that I have a sarcastic sense of humor, that is all. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 12:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

But, on a more serious note: The fact that this issue has been discussed and dealt with in the past, is highly relevant to the current MOS talk page discussion. This was a good find. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 12:55, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Could have stopped after the first sentence, really. Reyk YO!  15:20, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Closed MOSTALK discussion
See Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 179, thus re-opening discussions here. --Francis Schonken (talk) 12:03, 10 March 2016 (UTC)