Wikipedia talk:XfD proposal

This is not such a good idea, and goes straight against established practice of the past five years or so. Requiring a consensus to keep things would make it too easy for people to gang up and get rid of things they don't like - such as that silly children's card game, that village you've never been to, or any number of articles on religion. It would thus force a lot of people to angrily keep watch over AFD all the time to make sure their items of interest were kept, and that's not a healthy environment to encourage new users to join.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  16:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Eh? Ok. ~  Flame vip  e  r  19:07, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

String theory
This article is cruft, only physicists know of or care about string theory. Laura

Keep, this nomination is odd. Not bad faith, but string theory is very important. Joe

Keep per above. Mike (author of article)
 * Note to closing admin-Mike is the author of this article. -Sam

Delete. I've never heard about string theory. Chris

Delete per WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information. Sam

Keep, this is a stupid AfD. Sue

This deletion was accepted because no consensus was reached.

See the problem? -Amarkov babble 02:32, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Um. Oh, good God, yes. This is shite. I apologise for this insult to mankind. ~  Flame vip  e  r  14:26, 12 October 2006 (UTC)