Wolf interval



In music theory, the wolf fifth (sometimes also called Procrustean fifth, or imperfect fifth) is a particularly dissonant musical interval spanning seven semitones. Strictly, the term refers to an interval produced by a specific tuning system, widely used in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries: the quarter-comma meantone temperament. More broadly, it is also used to refer to similar intervals (of close, but variable magnitudes) produced by other tuning systems, including Pythagorean and most meantone temperaments.

When the twelve notes within the octave of a chromatic scale are tuned using the quarter-comma meantone systems of temperament, one of the twelve intervals apparently spanning seven semitones is actually a diminished sixth, which turns out to be much wider than the in-tune genuine fifths, In mean-tone systems, this interval is usually from C♯ to A♭ or from G♯ to E♭ but can be moved in either direction to favor certain groups of keys. The eleven perfect fifths sound almost perfectly consonant. Conversely, the diminished sixth used as a substitute is severely dissonant: It sounds like the howl of a wolf, because of a phenomenon called beating. Since the diminished sixth is nominally enharmonically equivalent to a perfect fifth, but in meantone temperament, enharmonic notes are only nearby (within about $1⁄4$ sharp or $1⁄4$ flat); the discordance of substituted interval is called the "wolf fifth".

Besides the above-mentioned quarter comma meantone, other tuning systems may produce severely dissonant diminished sixths. Conversely, in 12 tone equal temperament (12-TET), which is currently the most commonly used tuning system, the diminished sixth is not a wolf fifth, as it has exactly the same size as a perfect fifth.

By extension, any interval which is perceived as severely dissonant and regarded as "howling like a wolf" is called a wolf interval. For instance, in quarter comma meantone, the augmented second, augmented third, augmented fifth, diminished fourth, and diminished seventh may be called wolf intervals, as their frequency ratio significantly deviates from the ratio of the corresponding justly tuned interval (see Size of quarter-comma meantone intervals).

Temperament and the wolf
The reason for "wolf" tones in meantone tunings is the bad practice of performers pressing the key for an enharmonic note as a substitute for a note that has not been tuned on the keyboard; e.g. pressing the black key tuned to G♯ when the music calls for A♭. In all meantone tuning systems, sharps and flats are not equivalent; a relic of which, that persists in modern musical practice, is to fastidiously distinguish the musical notation for two notes which are the same pitch in equal temperament ("enharmonic") and played with the same key on an equal tempered keyboard (such as C♯ and D♭, or  E♯ and F♮), despite the fact that they are the same in all but theory.

In order to close the circle of fifths in 12 note scales, twelve fifths must average out to $700$ cents Each of the first eleven fifths (starting with the fifth below the tonic, the subdominant: F in the key of C, when each black key is tuned to a meantone sharp / no flats) has a value of $700$ cents, where $ε$ is some small number of cents that all fifths are detuned by. In meantone temperament tuning systems, the twelfth and last fifth does not exist in the 12 note octave on the keyboard. The actual note available is really a diminished sixth: The interval is $700 − ε$ cents, and is not a correct meantone fifth, which would be $700 + 11 ε$ cents. The difference of $700 − ε$ cents between the available pitch and the intended pitch is the source of the "wolf". The "wolf" effect is particularly grating for values of $12 ε$ cents that approach $12 ε$ cents A simplistic reaction to the problem is: "Of course it sounds awful: You're playing the wrong note!"

With only 12 notes available in a conventional keyboard's octave, in meantone tunings there must always be omitted notes. For example, one choice for tuning an instrument in meantone, to play music in the key of C♮, would be
 * {| style="text-align:center;"

with this set of chosen notes in bold face, and some of the omitted notes shown in grey.
 * A &emsp;|| &emsp;|| B♭ &emsp;|| B &emsp;||  &emsp;|| C &emsp;|| C♯ &emsp;||  &emsp;||   &emsp;||
 * D &emsp;|| &emsp;|| E♭ &emsp;|| E &emsp;||  &emsp;|| F &emsp;|| F♯ &emsp;||  &emsp;|| G &emsp;|| G♯ &thinsp;
 * }
 * D &emsp;|| &emsp;|| E♭ &emsp;|| E &emsp;||  &emsp;|| F &emsp;|| F♯ &emsp;||  &emsp;|| G &emsp;|| G♯ &thinsp;
 * }

This limitation on the set meantone notes and their sharps and flats that can be tuned on a keyboard at any one time, was the main reason that Baroque period keyboard and orchestral harp performers were obliged to retune their instruments in mid-performance breaks, in order to make available all the accidentals called for by the next piece of music. Some music that modulates too far between keys cannot be played on a single keyboard or single harp, no matter how it is tuned: In the example tuning above, music that modulates from C major into both A major (which needs G♯ for the seventh note) and C minor (which needs A♭ for its sixth note) is not possible, since each of the two meantone notes, G♯ and A♭, both require the same string in each octave on the instrument to be tuned to their different pitches.

For expediency, keyboard players substitute the wrong diminished sixth interval for a genuine meantone fifth (or neglect retuning their instrument). Though not available, a genuine meantone fifth would be consonant, but in meantone tuning systems (where $ε$ isn't zero) the sharp of any note is always different from the flat of the note above it. A meantone keyboard that allowed unlimited modulation theoretically would require an infinite number of separate sharp and flat keys, and then double sharps and double flats, and so on: There must inevitably be missing pitches on a standard keyboard with only 12 notes in an octave. The value of $ε$ changes depending on the tuning system. In other tuning systems (such as Pythagorean tuning and twelfth-comma meantone), each of the eleven fifths may have a size of $20~25$ cents, thus the diminished sixth is $20~25$ cents. If their difference $700 + ε$, is very large, as in the quarter-comma meantone tuning system, the diminished sixth is used as a substitute for a fifth, it is called a "wolf fifth".

In terms of frequency ratios, in order to close the circle of fifths, the product of the fifths' ratios must be $700 − 11 ε$ (since the twelve fifths, if closed in a circle, span seven octaves exactly; an octave is $12 ε$, and $128$), and if $ε$ is the size of a fifth, $2:1$, or $27 = 128$, will be the size of the wolf.

We likewise find varied tunings for the thirds: Major thirds must average $128 : f11$ cents, and to each pair of thirds of size $f11 : 128$ cents we have a third (or diminished fourth) of $400$ cents, leading to eight thirds $400 ∓ 4 ε$ cents narrower or wider, and four diminished fourths $400 ± 8 ε$ cents wider or narrower than average. Three of these diminished fourths form major triads with perfect fifths, but one of them forms a major triad substituting the diminished sixth for a real fifth. If the diminished sixth is a wolf interval, this triad is called the wolf major triad.

Similarly, we obtain nine minor thirds of $4 ε$ cents and three minor thirds (or augmented seconds) of $8 ε$ cents.

Quarter comma meantone
In quarter-comma meantone, the frequency ratio for the fifth is $300 ± 3 ε$, which is about $300 ∓ 9 ε$ cents flatter than an equal tempered $\sqrt{ 5$ cents, (or exactly one twelfth of a diesis) and so the wolf is about $3.42157$ cents, or $700$ cents sharper than a perfect fifth of ratio exactly $737.637$, and this is the original "howling" wolf fifth.

The flat minor thirds are only about $35.682$ cents sharper than a subminor third of ratio $3:2$, and the sharp major thirds, of ratio exactly $2.335$, are about $7:6$ cents flatter than the supermajor third of $32:25$. Meantone tunings with slightly flatter fifths produce even closer approximations to the subminor and supermajor thirds and corresponding triads. These thirds therefore hardly deserve the appellation of wolf, and in fact historically have not been given that name.

The wolf fifth of quarter-comma meantone can be approximated by the 7-limit just interval $7.712$, which has a size of $9:7$ cents.

Pythagorean tuning
In Pythagorean tuning, there are eleven justly tuned fifths sharper than $49:32$ cents by about $737.652$ cents (or exactly one twelfth of a Pythagorean comma), and hence one fifth will be flatter by twelve times that, which is $700$ cents (one Pythagorean comma) flatter than a just fifth. A fifth this flat can also be regarded as "howling like a wolf." There are also now eight sharp and four flat major thirds.

Five-limit tuning
Five-limit tuning was designed to maximize the number of pure intervals, but even in this system several intervals are markedly impure. 5-limit tuning yields a much larger number of wolf intervals with respect to Pythagorean tuning, which can be considered a 3-limit just intonation tuning. Namely, while Pythagorean tuning determines only 2 wolf intervals (a fifth and a fourth), the 5-limit symmetric scales produce 12 of them, and the asymmetric scale 14. It is also important to note that the two fifths, three minor thirds, and three major sixths marked in orange in the tables (ratio $1.955$, $23.460$, and $40:27$; or G↓, E♭↓, and A↑), even though they do not completely meet the conditions to be wolf intervals, deviate from the corresponding pure ratio by an amount (1 syntonic comma, i.e., $32:27$, or about $27:16$ cents) large enough to be clearly perceived as dissonant.

Five-limit tuning determines one diminished sixth of size $81:80$ (about $21.5$ cents, i.e. $1024:675$ cents sharper than the $722$ Pythagorean perfect fifth). Whether this interval should be considered dissonant enough to be called a wolf fifth is a controversial matter.

Five-limit tuning also creates two impure perfect fifths of size $20$. Five-limit fifths are about $3:2$ cents; less pure than the $40:27$ Pythagorean and/or just $680$ perfect fifth. They are not diminished sixths, but relative to the Pythagorean perfect fifth they are less consonant (about $3:2$ cents flatter) and hence, they might be considered to be wolf fifths. The corresponding inversion is an impure perfect fourth of size $701.95500 cent$ (about $20$ cents). For instance, in the C major diatonic scale, an impure perfect fifth arises between D and A, and its inversion arises between A and D.

Since in this context the term perfect is interpreted to mean 'perfectly consonant', the impure perfect fourth and perfect fifth are sometimes simply called the imperfect fourth and fifth. However, the widely adopted standard naming convention for musical intervals classifies them as perfect intervals, together with the octave and unison. This is also true for any perfect fourth or perfect fifth which slightly deviates from the perfectly consonant $27:20$ or $520$ ratios (for instance, those tuned using 12 tone equal or quarter-comma meantone temperament). Conversely, the expressions imperfect fourth and imperfect fifth do not conflict with the standard naming convention when they refer to a dissonant augmented third or diminished sixth (e.g. the wolf fourth and fifth in Pythagorean tuning).

"Taming the wolf"
Wolf intervals are a consequence of mapping a two-dimensional temperament to a one-dimensional keyboard. The only solution is to make the number of dimensions match. That is, either:


 * Keep the (one-dimensional) piano keyboard, and shift to a one-dimensional temperament (e.g., equal temperament), or


 * Keep the two-dimensional temperament, and shift to a two-dimensional keyboard.

Keep the piano keyboard
When the perfect fifth is tempered to be exactly $4:3$ cents wide (that is, tempered by almost exactly $ε$ of a syntonic comma, or precisely $f$ of a Pythagorean comma) then the tuning is identical to the now-standard 12 tone equal temperament.

Because of the compromises (and wolf intervals) forced on meantone tunings by the one-dimensional piano-style keyboard, well temperaments and eventually 12-tone equal temperament became more popular.

A fifth of the size Mozart favored, at or near the 55 equal temperament fifth of 698.182 cents, will have a wolf of $3:2$ cents: $700$ cents sharper than a justly tuned fifth. This howls far less acutely, but is still noticeable.

The wolf can be "tamed" by adopting equal temperament or a well temperament. The very intrepid may simply want to treat it as a xenharmonic music interval; depending on the size of the meantone fifth, the wolf fifth can be tuned to more complex just ratios 20:13, 26:17, 17:11, 32:21, or 49:32.

With a more extreme meantone temperament, like 19 equal temperament, the wolf is large enough that it is closer in size to a sixth than a fifth, and sounds like a different interval altogether rather than a mistuned fifth.

Keep the two-dimensional tuning system
A lesser-known alternative method that allows the use of multi-dimensional temperaments without wolf intervals is to use a two-dimensional keyboard that is "isomorphic" with that temperament. A keyboard and temperament are isomorphic if they are generated by the same intervals. For example, the Wicki keyboard shown in Figure 1 is generated by the same musical intervals as the syntonic temperament—that is, by the octave and tempered perfect fifth—so they are isomorphic.

On an isomorphic keyboard, any given musical interval has the same shape wherever it appears—in any octave, key, and tuning—except at the edges. For example, on Wicki's keyboard, from any given note, the note that is a tempered perfect fifth higher is always up-and-rightwardly adjacent to the given note. There are no wolf intervals within the note-span of this keyboard. The only problem is at the edge, on the note E♯. The note that is a tempered perfect fifth higher than E♯ is B♯, which is not included on the keyboard shown (although it could be included in a larger keyboard, placed just to the right of A♯, hence maintaining the keyboard's consistent note-pattern). Because there is no B♯ button, when playing an E♯ power chord, one must choose some other note that is close in pitch to B♯, such as C, to play instead of the missing B♯. That is, the interval from E♯ to C would be a "wolf interval" on this keyboard. In 19-TET, the interval from E♯ to C♭ would be (enharmonic to) a perfect fifth.

However, such edge conditions produce wolf intervals only if the isomorphic keyboard has fewer buttons per octave than the tuning has enharmonically distinct notes. For example, the isomorphic keyboard in Figure 2 has 19 buttons per octave, so the above-cited edge condition, from E♯ to C, is not a wolf interval in 12-TET, 17-TET, or 19-TET; however, it is a wolf interval in 26-TET, 31-TET, and 53-TET. In these latter tunings, using electronic transposition could keep the current key's notes centered on the isomorphic keyboard, in which case these wolf intervals would very rarely be encountered in tonal music, despite modulation to exotic keys.

A keyboard that is isomorphic with the syntonic temperament, such as Wicki's keyboard above, retains its isomorphism in any tuning within the tuning continuum of the syntonic temperament, even when changing tuning dynamically among such tunings. Plamondon, Milne & Sethares (2009), Figure 2, shows the valid tuning range of the syntonic temperament.