Talk:Liberalism (international relations)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kamerynpoullard.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kwaddick.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Realism in international relations - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 19:22, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No Criticism Section?[edit]

This article seems a little biased. Current events alone challenge the conclusions of this school of thought. ISIS, Russia, Kim Jong Un, and the challenges facing the EU are all examples of new and existing challenges that clearly aren't being resolved by policies based on this theory of international relations. 63.152.68.159 (talk) 16:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Though this article lacks in particular realist, Marxist and neoliberal critiques of traditional liberalism within international relations theory, criticism sections are not the best way to introduce those views. See WP:STRUCTURE. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 11:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By contrast, the Realism (international relations) page has a rich Criticisms section (in parts actually working as criticism of liberalism, by providing counter-criticism).

For readers inexperienced in the field (e.g. students), this easily gives the impression that Realism is very criticised, while Liberalism is not.

As far as I am aware, most Wikipedia articles about politics and similar subjects have a Criticisms section. It is usually helpful for identifying the limitations and scope of a certain view or ideology. Meyer.Fritz (talk) 08:52, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]