Talk:Barbados

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Barbados article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 90 days

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on 12 dates. [show]

November 30, 2005, November 30, 2006, November 30, 2007, November 30, 2008, November 30, 2009, November 30, 2010, November 30, 2011, November 30, 2012, November 30, 2013, November 30, 2014, November 30, 2015, and November 30, 2016

Caribbean: Barbados Top‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Barbados (assessed as Top-importance).

Countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles

WikiProject Countries to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Check out the article alerts; see if anything catches your fancy.
Cleanup : clean-up listing for Countries
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stubs by region.
Other : add {{WPCountries}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

African diaspora Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

November 28 to December 4, 2021

Proposed Page: Barbados (1966–2021).[edit]

Now that Barbados has become a republic, would it not make sense to create the page Barbados (1966–2021) similar to the Mauritius (1968–1992) page. --Kappasi (talk) 12:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. J 1982 (talk) 17:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, and that article quite frankly seems to have no utility. While the change is of great ceremonial importance, it has little effect on Barbados, Barbadians, and their political system. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 21:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. There's nothing much that would be added to it (as it is just a passing footnote) and it doesn't require duplicate articles that are about 95% the same (just because). CaribDigita (talk) 16:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They were already an independent country and also calling it the "world's newest republic" is very offensive and demeaning! 2601:49:8400:20F0:3D4D:DFBD:1ED2:3BD3 (talk) 18:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2601:49:8400:20F0:3D4D:DFBD:1ED2:3BD3 (talk) 18:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli flag overlayed over article[edit]

Why is the Israeli flag overlayed over the Barbados article on the app (but not on the web) and how can one remove it, as it has no reason for being there. Fxhomie (talk) 05:22, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's template vandalism. Please be patient until the cache expires (I've purged it so it should be fixed hopefully soon, if not already). Nardog (talk) 05:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Injustice and money[edit]

Barbados is wrong because:

Slavery was long ago.
They are better of than in Africa.
I thought we had buried the hatchet at independence.
How do you quantify the money owed any how?
They just want loads of money of us (£2.0-3.9bn) after other sources like the IMF got fed up giving them heaps of aid.
They Blacks it was all anti-Black racisum and ignor that we Brits also screwd Cylon and British India up.
The UK and France are always blamed yet *Belgian, Germany, Spain and Portugal got away with it. *=Mark Twain wrote a book condemning the Belgian Congo at the time, but this is now ignored.
The UK is economy stagnant and can't afford to be a cornucopia.

17:13, 7 December 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:91AB:BC01:54FF:1749:B9AA:7200 (talk)

Barbados is Not the World's Newest Republic![edit]

Technically, calling Barbados the "world's newest republic" is a misnomer because Barbados was already an independent nation before becoming a republic in 2021. However, some may use this phrase to emphasize the recent change in its political structure and highlight its newfound sovereignty without any symbolic ties to the British monarchy. While the terminology might not be entirely accurate, it reflects the significance of Barbados's transition to a republic. 2601:49:8400:20F0:3D4D:DFBD:1ED2:3BD3 (talk) 18:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Referring to Barbados as the "world's newest republic" can be seen as disingenuous or sensationalized because it oversimplifies the country's history and political development by focusing solely on the recent transition to a republic, it ignores the fact that Barbados has been an independent nation since 1966. This kind of sensationalized language may create a false impression that Barbados was not truly independent before 2021, which is inaccurate and very offensive to the people who live there.

Moreover, it overlooks the complexities of Barbados and its relationship with the British monarchy and the careful deliberations and decision-making processes that led to the transition to a republic. Such sensationalized language may serve to grab attention or create a narrative of novelty without providing a nuanced understanding of Barbados and its political evolution.

In summary, while calling Barbados the "world's newest republic" may draw attention to recent changes in its political structure, it can be misleading and fails to capture the full context of Barbados's history as an independent nation. 2601:49:8400:20F0:3D4D:DFBD:1ED2:3BD3 (talk) 18:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Calling Barbados the "World's Newest Republic" is Offensive[edit]

2601:49:8400:20F0:3D4D:DFBD:1ED2:3BD3 (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Describing Barbados as the "world's newest republic" in a sensationalized or exaggerated manner can be offensive because it diminishes the country's history, sovereignty, and the agency of its people by implying that Barbados was not truly independent until it became a republic in 2021, this language undermines the struggles and achievements of the Barbadian people since gaining independence in 1966.

Such terminology can be perceived as disrespectful to the Barbadian nation and its citizens, as it suggests that their previous status as an independent Commonwealth realm was somehow incomplete or insufficient also disregarding the decades of self-governance, nation-building, and contributions to the global community that Barbados has made since gaining independence.

Furthermore, it may perpetuate colonialist attitudes by framing the transition to a republic as the ultimate validation of Barbados's sovereignty, as if it needed external approval or recognition to be considered truly independent. This narrative ignores the agency and autonomy of the Barbadian people in shaping their destiny and reinforces a hierarchy that places Western ideals and structures above those of other nations.

In essence, using sensationalized or exaggerated language to describe Barbados and its transition to a republic can be offensive because it diminishes the country's history and sovereignty while perpetuating colonialist attitudes and undermining the agency of its people and it is important to approach discussions about Barbados and its political evolution with sensitivity, respect, and an understanding of its rich and complex history. 2601:49:8400:20F0:3D4D:DFBD:1ED2:3BD3 (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose if you don't see Barbados as the world's newest republic, you don't have to call it that? The only mention that I see of it being the world's newest republic is from a reference to a news source. Anyways, I don't see how this is related to the article? 7s3s (talk) 02:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]