Talk:EndNote

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2013; 2016; 2017; 2018; 2019; 2021;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2020 and 16 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Trep1908.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Legal dispute with Zotero: "click-thru license" is unsourced[edit]

"They also added a restrictive click-thru license to their styles download website" was added in this revision by @Nealmcb. I found this sentence confusing, as someone unfamiliar with the subject matter I was unsure which party "they" was referring to (my assumption is Thomson Reuters). I viewed the citation in an attempt to figure this out, but was unable to find any mention of a "click-thru license" in the original text.

This source previously (revision) appeared after the first sentence in this section, but was moved to the end of the paragraph when the click-thru license sentence was added.

Because I could not find any information about said click-thru license in the source, I am adding {{failed verification}}. Firvqipo (talk) 13:27, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Endnote 20.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:22, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep version history and compatibility?[edit]

Is it worth keeping all of the version history and compatibility section? I don't see it on other software pages. ToneDaBass (talk) 22:30, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely excessive, along with possibly the two preceding sections. Feel free to trim them down. –CWenger (^ • @) 22:58, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Archives (Index)
2013 2016 2017 2018 2019 2021
This page is archived by ClueBot III.