User talk:Herosarm

Welcome!

Hello, Herosarm, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:The Beat Goes On Inc., may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 18:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Beat Goes On Inc.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The Beat Goes On Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 18:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Beat Goes On inc. (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ratnahastin were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Beat Goes On inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 15:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Herosarm! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ratnahastin (talk) 15:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

I am unsure why this article is being declined for lack of sources. I am using information directly from the company’s website as well as the owners of the company. Herosarm (talk) 20:14, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Beat Goes On inc. (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Beat Goes On inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Beat Goes On inc. (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Beat Goes On inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

I’ve included references to official city websites, a third party and impartial interview, and relevant links for the business itself. I am unsure why this is still being declined. Herosarm (talk) 19:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

The submission is very far from being approved. It would also be declined for being blatant advertising. Note that WP:COI states that "COI editing is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. It undermines public confidence and risks causing public embarrassment to the individuals and companies being promoted. Editors with a COI are sometimes unaware of whether or how much it has influenced their editing. If COI editing causes disruption, an administrator may opt to place blocks on the involved accounts." I suggest rather familiarising yourself with Wikipedia and contributing to topics unrelated to your COI where you can learn what is required. Greenman (talk) 20:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Herosarm/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi,

I have included reference links that were not written by myself or the business owner in the cited sources. I have also included objective language. If you could point to what language exactly is reading like an advertisement and not like a business’ biography I would greatly appreciate that as I have rewritten this several times and it keeps being declined. Herosarm (talk) 18:21, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

Could you please provide more context as to what is causing this article to be declined? The language is objective and the cited sources are third party except for one or two that direct the reader to expanded information about the company.

Thank you Herosarm (talk) 22:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, could I please receive additional information as to why this has been declined? This is written objectively. Herosarm (talk) 03:59, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Beat Goes On (May 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Iwaqarhashmi were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Waqar💬 20:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

I am unsure why a popular Canadian business is not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. I can list hundreds of other businesses that have their own pages, including competitors in the same space. Herosarm (talk) 20:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a directory or database of things that exist. Competitors meriting articles(if they do, they may not and we just haven't dealt with it yet) does not mean your business does. Only articles that are classified as good articles should be used as an example or model. If you have a good article that is similar to your draft, please point it out.

Typically, articles are written by independent editors wholly unconnected with the topic in any way. 331dot (talk) 21:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

After reading the cited article on “good articles” you attached, I do not see how this article does not qualify nor do I understand how factual information about a popular Canadian business is not something permitted on the platform.

Reviewing the article attached good articles are “well-written, contain factually accurate and verifiable information, are broad in coverage, neutral in point of view, stable, and illustrated, where possible, by relevant images with suitable copyright licenses.” I’ve had to edit the article multiple times because it was deemed promotional, now that I have taken out all superlative information and extensive content about the business as a whole it is being rejected for a different reason altogether. Herosarm (talk) 21:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not for merely providing "factual information". It is factual information to say that my local grocery store has a sale on oranges, but that is not valid encyclopedia content. As I said, Wikipedia is not a place for businesses to tell about themselves. We want to know what others say about the business and what makes it a notable business. What are the three best independent reliable sources that discuss your business in depth, on their own, not based on materials from the business?

Please examine some articles that are actually classified as good articles to see what is being looked for. 331dot (talk) 22:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

I’d like to request an additional review from another reviewer. I merely responded quoted your own citation. Herosarm (talk) 22:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

You are free to do that, but the response will be the same. You seem to fundamentally misunderstand what is being looked for, and seem to be disregarding my advice. 331dot (talk) 23:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)