Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Internet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject iconInternet Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

GAR for Twitter[edit]

Splitting discussion for List of fake news websites[edit]

An article related to this WikiProject (List of fake news websites: 645kb) has content that is proposed to be removed and moved to six other articles. If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 01:13, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Charlie Morningstar" and "Vaggie" at AfD[edit]

"Charlie Morningstar" and "Vaggie" have been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Morningstar and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaggie. Your comments on these AfDs would be appreciated. Historyday01 (talk) 04:05, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request at Talk:Sam Yagan[edit]

Hi, I am reaching out to see if WikiProject Internet members are interested in reviewing a request to update the article on OKCupid co-founder Sam Yagan at Talk:Sam_Yagan#Request_to_add_Corazon_Capital_subsection. I made this request on behalf of Yagan through my work at Corazon Capital. Thank you for considering. CBCorazon (talk) 20:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Decocidio#Requested move 24 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 09:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for help with Fastly History section edits[edit]

Hello! I work for the content delivery and edge computing company Fastly. I'm here as a COI editor, to see if anyone would like to take a look at an edit request we have on the Fastly Talk page. The request started out as one to add an Acquisitions section to the article, but we've received some constructive criticism on that approach, so we're instead proposing that the History section be revised and updated with improved sourcing and some fresh facts. If you would like to review, please use this link.

Oh, and to clear up any confusion: you'll see that a colleague of mine has placed the request and some follow-up posts. That's because he's out-of-office right now and I'm filling in for him. Feel free to tag either of us into any feedback you may have. Thank you! Supnah (talk) 17:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]