This category is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This category is part of WikiProject Current events, an attempt to expand and better organize information in articles related to current events. If you would like to participate in the project, visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.Current eventsWikipedia:WikiProject Current eventsTemplate:WikiProject Current eventsCurrent events articles
The season is over for those teams that didn't make the play off, so they should be removed from this category. The teams in the play off should be removed once they are eliminated.--Nitsansh 14:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Same for college football teams, with the exception of Ohio State and Florida whose season is not over yet.--Nitsansh 14:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In part to make it easier to find stale articles that need the tag removed, I propose creating a new tag along the lines of {{current sports season}}, just for seasons obviously. This would mean the ones remaining in here were genuinely "current events", and make the category useful for patrolling. Any objections? --W.marsh 17:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
