Category talk:Districts of Belarus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconBelarus NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Article names[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


User:Altenmann, User:Ymblanter - could you help to fix transliteration. E.g. some entities have diacritics in Category:Districts of Gomel Region.

Also, when you change transliteration, maybe in the same run you can unify "raion" and "rajon" to "district"?

For each of you I saw a move of a district page, and it seems that you have better understanding of the transliteration. So, if I would fix raion/rajon, there would still be the need for someone to review the transliteration - I am not good with that. Derianus (talk) 23:22, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Overview:

Derianus (talk) 23:26, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • There was no consensus for these moves even though we invested a lot of effort into finding one.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:08, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Amount of time is not relevant. But if you made a good work, you probably have at least a page that summarizes the reasons for each naming variant? Derianus (talk) 15:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For the record: User:Ymblanter in 2013 moved at least two articles from X Raion to Y District [1], [2]. But now he says, there is no consensus. Derianus (talk) 21:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.