This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Dominican nuns is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
I realy think that we really only need one of these to categories. It's a small group to begin with. No need for both. --evrik 18:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Dominican nuns is for individual nuns, not for anything and everything applying to Dominican nuns. This is the case for every other category for monks and nuns, so I fail to see why there should be an exception here. It's a good idea to have some consistency. We commonly separate biographical articles from other articles in WP cats, since it's a useful division to make. It also makes the biographical cats easier to further categorise into the cats for people, into which tree this cat fits (or did before Evrik decided to remove categories). -- Necrothesp 19:01, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think you're dividing the pie up too small. The words is itself plural. If nthis were a large category I might agree, but I doubt it will ever be big enough to worry about. --evrik 15:12, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If the cat is part of a larger categorisation system then it is acceptable to have small categories for consistency. It already has eight entries, which is larger than many other categories. Also, please do not delete categories which I have added just because there is discussion. Your version is not definitive unless there is some consensus for it to be so. Why have you deleted Category:Roman Catholic nuns? Are Dominican nuns not Roman Catholic nuns? -- Necrothesp 15:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Categorizing them as you have is duplicative. The second category shouldn't even exist. That too is duplicative. --evrik 15:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why is it duplicative? Dominican nuns are a subcat of Roman Catholic nuns. They are also a subcat of Dominicans. No duplication there whatsoever. Which category shouldn't exist? This is all perfectly standard Wikipedia categorisation, which, with the greatest of respect, I'm not entirely sure that you understand. -- Necrothesp 16:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
making the long overduee merge. ----evrik(talk) 15:08, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
