Category talk:Hypothetical astronomical objects

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Category‑class

	Astronomy portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This category is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Physics Category‑class

	Physics portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

simplifying[edit]

The subcategories of this category were needlessly subdivided and thus not very useful (including many empty categories). I have simplified them to two: Category:Hypothetical extrasolar astronomical objects, and Category:Hypothetical solar system astronomical objects. RandomCritic 20:17, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was not very good. It broke categorization, and Hypothetical planets was well populated. 132.205.44.134 23:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was very inconsiderate RandomCritic. I spent hours populating this category. Now, I will have to go through all those articles again. Next time, follow the wikipedia etiquette and post in discussion first. Wikipedians like me and the person above will make it clear to you that this “needless” accessibility is what makes a good category. Mrwuggs 15:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

category description[edit]

The category introductory material appears to be an article. 132.205.44.134 23:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is copied from an article. Perhaps I will condense it if people like Randomcritic will stop undoing my work. Mrwuggs 15:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This discription is now more concise. Mrwuggs 01:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]