This article is within the scope of WikiProject Secret Societies, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Secret SocietiesWikipedia:WikiProject Secret SocietiesTemplate:WikiProject Secret SocietiesSecret Societies articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This category was nominated for deletion on 2 February 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.
The name of this category should be nominated to be checked for its neutrality.
The category contained a lot of people falsely alleged to be involved in the fantasy story of "Priory of Sion". They don't belong to this category, since they never partook in the Priory of Sion hoax from early and mid 1900ths, most of them living in other centuries than the 20th; they should instead be looked up via the articlePriory of Sion hoax. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 08:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Now consider if we create categories like Categories:War and Peace (Leo Tolstoy) for each and every historical novella. How much of the articles of reknowned generals or king and queens will then be text contra category links? The idea of putting people refered to in a fictional work into a category of that fictional work is not well considered. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 08:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
