This category is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
This category is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Bad idea. What is wrong with having "Women's cricket in England" under W in a category called "Cricket in England"? What does such a "standard key" actually achieve? Some people on here would do better to try and improve articles instead of tinkering with trivial issues like that. Jack | talk page 16:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@User:BlackJack, that trivia claim cuts both ways. If you feel that is a trivial issue, why bother to revert it?
The reason for using a standard sort key for gendered categories is simply so that both gendered categories sort alongside each other. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 16:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@BHG. I reverted it because it makes a mess of the category by giving women's cricket an apparent importance which, frankly, it does not have. Introducing a key of that sort is pedantic, a better word than "trivial", and the people responsible should find more productive ways to spend their time on here. Surely a category about cricket is best managed by people who know and understand both the game and what people browsing the categories are actually looking for. Someone searching for "women's cricket" is not going to look under +, they will look under W. Sometimes, I despair. Jack | talk page 16:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Jack, I am still very amused that you don't spot the irony og your insistence on reverting something which you find trivial. If you believe that it's trivial, why don't you find sometging better to do with your time?
Anyway, thank you so much for setting out your view of women's sport. It does explain why you are so keen using to use a sort key which places women's sport at the end of the list, rather than placing both genders near the top, as in other sports. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 17:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
.JPG)