Draft:123FormBuilder
Submission declined on 15 April 2024 by ToadetteEdit (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 1 April 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Theroadislong 53 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 28 March 2024 by Hey man im josh (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Hey man im josh 57 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 21 March 2024 by MicrobiologyMarcus (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by MicrobiologyMarcus 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 20 March 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Theroadislong 2 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 19 March 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 2 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 18 March 2024 by MicrobiologyMarcus (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by MicrobiologyMarcus 2 months ago. | |
Comment: It is disruptive to re-submit with zero improvement. Theroadislong (talk) 09:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Sections, not bold, is the proper layout as per our WP:MOS. AfC reviewers are trying to assist you in your draft when we make changes to proper style, as on Special:Diff/1214373251. When you undo them, as on Special:Diff/1214582864, it gets in the way of the draft's acceptance. I've re-added them (Special:Diff/1214837424), and would advise not to continue to undo it, if your goal is to get the draft article accepted. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 14:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Forbes.com and press releases are not reliable sources and this is just advertising. Theroadislong (talk) 16:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Not one of the sources cited contributes to WP:NCORP notability. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 | This article contains paid contributions. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. |
 | |
| Industry | Software as a Service (SaaS) |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Timisoara , Romania |
Key people | - Florin Cornianu, co-founder & CEO - Tudor Bastea, co-founder |
Number of employees | 43 |
| Website | 123FormBuilder.com |
123FormBuilder, established in 2008 in Timișoara, Romania, is a software company that offers an online form-building platform, also named 123FormBuilder. It was originally founded by Florin Cornianu and Tudor Bastea under the name 123ContactForm, with the company rebranding to its current name in late 2017.[1][2]
123FormBuilder app features a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface that enables the creation of customized online forms without the need for advanced coding expertise.[3][4]
History[edit]
123FormBuilder, established in 2008 in Timișoara, Romania, is a web-based software service. Timișoara is recognized as one of the leading tech hubs in Central and Eastern Europe. The service began as a side project called 123ContactForm SRL, initiated by Florin Cornianu and Tudor Bastea.[5][6][7]
In 2012, 123ContactForm introduced its form-building application for Wix Website Builder,[8] followed by a launch on Weebly in 2016.[9]
In 2015, the company received an investment of 1 million euros from Catalyst Romania, a private equity growth and venture capital fund.[10]
In 2017, 123FormBuilder became available on the Salesforce AppExchange platform.[11][12]
In December 2020, venture capital firm 212 acquired a shareholders' position in the Company, securing a seat on the board.[13]
Since its foundation, 123FormBuilder has experienced a year-on-year growth rate of 100% and served over 200,000 users by 2014. In 2015, the number of users grew to 500,000 worldwide.[14][15]
In 2022, 123FormBuilder ranked as a Leader in G2’s Form Builder, Survey, and Lead Capture categories for all business sizes.[16][17]
In January 2024, 123FormBuilder was ranked first by Capterra in the category of Free Survey Tools.[18]
Software[edit]
The product integrates with various business software tools for document management, email marketing, and CRM administration. Advanced features include conditional logic, digital signatures, custom email notifications, multi-page forms, and analytics.[19] [20] [21][22]
References[edit]
- ^ "Building Web Forms - Revolutionized". CEO Today Magazine. Retrieved 2020-04-08.
- ^ "Success stories - EIF in Romania". EIF. Retrieved 2018-02-01.
- ^ "123FormBuilder Helps Users Without Technical Skills Create Any Type Of Online Form". Superb Crew. Retrieved 2020-04-08.
- ^ "123FormBuilder Review 2024: A Marketing Expert's Verdict". Website Planet. Retrieved 2023-08-15.
- ^ "123FormBuilder: simplifying online forms". EIF. Retrieved 2018-09-04.
- ^ "Building Web Forms - Revolutionized". CEO Today Magazine. Retrieved 2020-04-08.
- ^ "How We Started A $420K/Month Online Forms And Surveys Tool". Starter Story. Retrieved 2020-03-13.
- ^ "123ContactForm Launches Form Making App for Wix Website Builder". prlog. Retrieved 2012-10-26.
- ^ "123ContactForm Launches 123 Form Builder for Weebly". socPub. Retrieved 2017-03-15.
- ^ "Catalyst Romania puts EUR 1 mln in local software developer". Romania Insider. Retrieved 2020-04-08.
- ^ "123FormBuilder is available on the Salesforce AppExchange". Salesforce AppExchange. Retrieved 2017-03-15.
- ^ "App of the Week – 123 Form Builder". CloudmyBiz. Retrieved 2018-10-18.
- ^ "212 Acquires Stake in 123 Form Builder". PR Newswire Insider. Retrieved 2020-12-09.
- ^ "123formbuilder". enlyft.
- ^ "How a freemium form builder is hitting $5M in revenue". Mixergy. Retrieved 2019-11-01.
- ^ "Leaders and Top Performers within G2 Grid® Fall Reports 2022". G2. Retrieved 2022-10-17.
- ^ "App of the Day: 123 Form Builder". NoCode Journal. Retrieved 2022-03-29.
- ^ "6 Top-Rated Free Survey Tools". Capterra. Retrieved 2024-01-17.
- ^ "123FormBuilder Features". GetApp. Retrieved 2020-04-08.
- ^ "123FormBuilder Features". G2. Retrieved 2023-07-10.
- ^ "123FormBuilder". Spotsaas. Retrieved 2024-03-20.
- ^ "123FormBuilder". Saasworthy. Retrieved 2024-04-02.
Categories:
- AfC submissions by date/02 April 2024
- AfC submissions by date/01 April 2024
- AfC submissions by date/28 March 2024
- AfC submissions by date/21 March 2024
- AfC submissions by date/20 March 2024
- AfC submissions by date/19 March 2024
- AfC submissions by date/18 March 2024
- Draft articles on internet culture
- Draft articles on media
- Draft articles on STEM
- AfC submissions on commercial products
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.