Draft:Doom Picnic
| Submission declined on 31 December 2023 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 9 November 2023 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Theroadislong 6 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 16 August 2023 by Leggomygreggo8 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Leggomygreggo8 9 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 3 August 2023 by Hey man im josh (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Hey man im josh 9 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 21 July 2023 by Paper9oll (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Paper9oll 10 months ago. | |
Comment: No point in piling on more external links. If you want to count them as sources, be it to show notability or to support the information, cite them properly. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:22, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Article still appears to fail WP:NALBUM. No reliable references appear to be present. Please see WP:RS. Leggomygreggo8 (talk) 05:33, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Article does not currently appear to pass WP:NALBUM. References are not reliable either. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: There is currently too much unsourced information in the article, with only inline citation. More inline citations should ideally be added. The subject however seems to be notable. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:53, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Please format your references according to WP:CITEHOW. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:39, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
| Doom Picnic | |
|---|---|
| Studio album by | |
| Released | 1992 |
| Recorded | Reciprocal Recording, Seattle |
| Studio | Reciprocal Recording |
| Genre | Grunge, Doom Metal, Sludge |
| Length | 32:48 |
| Label | Gun Records |
| Producer | Jack Endino |
Doom Picnic is the third album by German Grunge band Alien Boys. It was produced at Reciprocal Recording in Seattle by Jack Endino in spring 1991 and released in 1992 by Rave Records[1] in the USA and Gun Records in Europe.[2] [3]
Track listing[edit]
- "City of Rain" - 4:57
- "R.I.P." - 4:16
- "The Serpent" - 5:51
- "Space Machine" - 3:13
- "Elevator" - 3:20
- "Train of Doom" - 7:07
- "The Way I Laugh" - 4:04
References[edit]
External links[edit]
- "Jack Endino Discography".
- Schreuf, Kristof (December 1992). "Doom Picnic in". Die Tageszeitung: Taz. p. 19. Die Tageszeitung
- "Doom Picnic Review".at Rock Hard
- "Doom Picnic review in". darkside.ru
- "Doom Picnic in". 28 November 1992. Billboard
- "Doom Picnic Review". AllMusic.at Allmusic
- "Doom Picnic in". metalmusicarchives
- Doom Picnic at Discogs