Draft:Trial of John Haggerty

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Comment: Something in this is certainly notable, but I'm not sure if this is the ideal format or page title for the content. PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Comment: The article is still too reliant on primary sources or trivial mentions, which are fine to be cited, but a few more significant coverage from reliable and independent sources (such as the first cited Courtney E. Thompson book) are needed to reinforce the claim on notability. pennblog does not seem to be a reliable source. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 16:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Comment: This reads like a detailed summary of what's been going on in the book. It really needs more external news sources than besides what's in the book. It does not seem to be written for Wikipedia but for some website. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Comment: Should this be repurposed to Trial of John Haggerty as with the book that seems to be used to cover most of the details presented here? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:15, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Comment: I'm declining the article for now because it would be good to have more sources. It looks like the only 3 sources used in the article are the report on the trial, an index of death penalties and a typepad blog post. This doesn't seem like enough to meet notability guidelines and I'm not sure the last one is a reliable source.
    Finding secondary sources like books or articles about the trial and its impact on US law would be very helpful. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 11:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Comment: rather a lot of unsourced content? Theroadislong (talk) 11:20, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Commonwealth v. Haggerty
CourtCourt of Oyer & Terminer, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
Full case nameCommonwealth of Pennsylvania v. John Haggerty
StartedJanuary 21, 1847
DecidedJanuary 28, 1847; 177 years ago (1847-01-28)
VerdictGuilty
ChargeFirst-degree murder
Case history
Subsequent action(s)Haggerty sentenced to be hung on April 23, 1847
Court membership
Judge sittingEllis Lewis

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. John Haggerty was an 1847 trial of Irish American laborer John Haggerty for the murder of his neighbors Melchior Fordney and Catherine Tripple on October 17, 1846. The trial was noted for its early use of the insanity defense three years after the establishment of the M'Naughten rules in the United Kingdom — one of the first such cases in American jurisprudence — and for its extensive use of phrenological evidence.[1][2][3][4]

Life of Haggerty[edit]

John Haggerty (died 23 April 1847[5]) was an Irish American laborer.[2][3] He was born in the Irish portion of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and immigrated to Montreal, Quebec at the age of 20.[6] Haggerty initially worked a number of occupations including being a lumberjack in Montreal, where he sustained a depressed fracture on the left side of his head due to being hit with a cart shaft.[7] Eighteen years prior to his attack on Fordney, Haggerty immigrated to Lancaster County, Pennsylvania with his wife. In the autumn of 1831, they were tenants of Benjamin Herr in Manor Township, before being evicted due to Haggerty having attacked Herr's distiller, Thomas McFarland, with a hammer.[8] Haggerty eventually moved to South Queen Street in Lancaster, as a neighbour to Melchoir Fordney, in April 1846.[9][6]

Haggerty was known for his alcoholism, resulting in several instances of alcohol-induced violence.[10]

By 1846, Haggerty was imprisoned or institutionalized at least three times, but it has been reported by witnesses of the crimes, according to his defense lawyer John L. Thompson in his later murder trial, that none of them included the consumption or aroma of alcohol on Haggerty.[6] On 26th October, 1832, Haggerty entered the house of farmer Isaac Hoover and his wife, and claimed the farmer's house as his own. Hoover confronted Haggerty, who responded with attempted violence with a knife. Hoover, with assistance from his father and another, transported Haggerty to Intercourse, Pennsylvania. Haggerty entered a store owned by Thomas C. Himes, and wielded a butcher's knife after being confronted by the group of three. Haggerty was then disarmed, detained and taken to magistrate Andrew Dunlap's office, of which it was determined that Haggerty was in a "state of derangement", and was sent by court order to a poorhouse in Lancaster on 27th October, 1832, and was discharged on 7th November, 1832.[11]

Eleven years prior to the murder of Fordney, Haggerty entered the house of Hugh Maxwell and his daughter, sat down at the coffee table and asked for food, before intimidating Maxwell and being ordered to leave.[12] The following year, Haggerty was institutionalized at a hospital in Chester County, Pennsylvania, and was declared insane.[6] Haggerty moved once again in 1836 as a neighbour to Jacob Ehler. After an altercation with Ehler in which Ehler claimed that Haggerty approached him with a concealed butcher knife, Haggerty moved to Stony Alley.[13][14] In 1840, Haggerty attempted to kill a resident named Sebastien Weiss while under the influence of alcohol, but only managed to paralyze him.[6][13][15] Responding to the incident, the Chester County sheriff deemed him to not be in a "right state of mind". He was imprisoned for six weeks in Eastern State Penitentiary, where he attempted suicide through impaling himself with a metal rod.[16][17] On April 1, 1845, Michael Carpenter (the alderman of Lancaster County) and Haggerty signed a voluntary agreement that Haggerty would abstain from alcohol for a year. Another voluntary abstinence agreement between the two would be signed on April 3, 1846.[18]

Personally appeared before me, an Alderman, in, and for said city, John Haggerty, of same place, who being duly swon saith that he will abstain from drinking any intoxicating liquors, from this 1st day of April, one year. Sworn and subscribed, April 1st, 1845, before me.

— Michael Carpenter and John Haggerty's first affidavit.[18]

Personally appeared, John Haggerty of said city, Laborer, who being duly sworn, saith that he will abstain from drinking spirituous liquors, for the space of one year from this thid day of April, 1846. Sworn and subscribed before me, April 3rd, 1846.

— Michael Carpenter and John Haggerty's second affidavit.[18]

Murder of Fordney[edit]

Prior to the murder of Melchoir Fordney, Haggerty progressively become delusional, expressing fierce concern over a horse he owned, who he claimed would talk to him, and spend the night prior to the murder fighting saints, and challenging Haggerty.[19] Additionally, Haggerty underwent specifically religious delirium, claiming that the Day of Judgement had arrived, a voice telling him that he must kill or be killed by Fordney in order to progress the Day of Judgement, and that Heaven was undergoing a war of which hundreds have been killed. Haggerty expressed the belief that at the time he believed him and Fordney were the only two people left in the world, and expressed confusion when Fordney's common-law wife, Catherine "Kitty" Tripple, saw the murder of Fordney.[19] On the day of the murder, Haggerty was supposed to visit the mayor's office to settle a previous infraction of damages to a neighbour, Jacob Bomberger.[20] Testimonies from neighbors of events prior to the murder highlighted several instances of aggressive behaviour to Fordney. One event three months prior was explained by neighbor Joseph Like, of Haggerty threatening the lives of Fordney and Tripple on assumptions of meddling in Haggerty's business and convincing a man to sue him.[21] A second event two weeks prior detailed by neighbor Lavinia Herr explained Haggerty threatening the life of Fordney's daughter Isabella if she trespassed on Haggerty's property again.[21] A third event four days prior detailed by Eliza Heissleman told of Haggerty threatening Tripple causing her to flee her home.[21] Fordney's son, Melchoir J. Fordney, testified that on 17th October, 1846, Haggerty sought to use a musket from Fordney's gunsmithing shop at 508 South Queen Street to kill his horse.[22] At 9am, Haggerty approached Fordney requesting Fordney shoot the horse, but this request was declined. In response, Haggerty forcefully commandeered a display weapon, engaged in repeated fails to fire, and retreated into his nearby home with the rifle.[22]

Haggerty later emerged from his home with the display rifle and an axe, loaded the weapon on the pavement and attempted to shoot the horse twice unsuccessfully due to the gun not firing. For the third attempt, the gun was loaded with silver sixpence coins and fired successfully, injuring the horse who ran away.[2] The horse was later examined by Frederick Niefer, and discovered a silver coin lodged in its chest.[23] The reasoning for using the silver coins was the belief of silver being the only method to kill spirits.[19] The gunshot alerted the neighbors, Fordney, and Tripple, resulting in Fordney attempting to disarm Haggerty, with Tripple pleading for the rifle to be handed over by Haggerty.[22] Haggerty pointed the rifle at Fordney after Fordney shook his fist at him.[2] Fordney fled into his residence. Haggerty then gave the musket to Tripple and began following and attacking Fordney with his axe. Tripple attempted to stop him unsuccessfully. Fordney and Tripple's six-year-old daughter, Isabella, was also present in the room, ending in all three being attacked by Haggerty and his axe. Haggerty locked the door to prevent escape for the victims and to prevent outside help from interfering.[2] Both Fordney and Tripple died at the scene, with Isabella being temporarily paralyzed, unconscious and severely hurt, but survived the attack due to being transported next door.[24] Haggerty blocked the front door with the corpse of Fordney, and neighbours attempted to open it.[20] As the residence door was closed, neighbor John Steigerwalt and his sons began throwing bricks and stones at the shop windows to distract Haggerty. Haggerty focused on the Steigerwalts when a stone hit him, threatening to attack them with the axe. Haggerty was then incapacitated and disarmed by Steigerwalt when a brick thrown by neighbor Michael Miller struck his head.[25][17] Another child of Fordney's alerted the deputies at the town courthouse. Haggerty was tied with rope at the scene and was about to be hanged by the neighbour group. Haggerty pleaded to be hanged, rather than stoned.[19] Haggerty also threatened another neighbour, Baltzar Nauman. Haggerty was delivered to the nearby prison by the neighbours and Deputy Sheriff Jacob Foltz[26], initially refusing clean clothes and having appeared to become sober.[17]

Whilst in custody, Haggerty's wounds were treated by the attending physician of the jail, Dr. Charles L. Baker. Baker's testimony explains the delusions that Haggerty experienced regarding his horse and other religious delirium, including seeing the Son of God riding a white horse on a tree, and his own horse fighting a battle "on the side of the Americans". Haggerty explained that he believed his horse was at times gentle, and at times the devil.[27] Haggerty was acutely aware of the punishment for his crimes, proclaiming to Dr Baker that he'll be hung, in an act of "blood for blood", and that he never held any animosity to Fordney, that the whole experience was "a dream".[27] Haggerty visualized the presence of a ball of fire falling from the sky that symbolized the end of the world, and that three weeks prior he thought his horse was the Antichrist. In describing his deliriums to a neighbour, Charles Boughter, Haggerty claimed the Antichrist and a fire breathing dragon[19][1] inhabited his horse and goat, and they fought all of the Friday night before. Haggerty bought corn on the morning of the murder to feed the horse in an attempt to stop the fighting[28][17] Another delusion was the presence of a tree that would rise and sink into the ground, and would have a "strange" breed of chickens where one of them "represented Martin van Buren".[29] A testimony by Dr John Leonard, who also tended to Haggerty after he was detained, mentioned that Haggerty saw his horse fighting against the British Army on the side of the Americans, and thus couldn't bring himself to kill his horse. Despite this, he saw his horse fighting against saints whilst being the Antichrist. When the horse lost this battle against the saints, Haggerty saw the saints being led down South Queen Street by George Washington.[30] Finally, Haggerty gave a piece of glass from a chandelier or other light fixture to the local Reverend Bernard Keenan, stating "this is the cause of all my ruin. I have taken it to be a diamond! A jewel!".[31]

Trial[edit]

The trial for the murder of Fordney was held from 21 January 1847 to 28 January 1847, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.[32] Haggerty pleaded not guilty.[32] The proceedings were conducted at the court of oyer and terminer, presided upon by judge and former Pennsylvania Attorney General Ellis Lewis, and associate justices Jacob Grosh and Emmanuel Schaeffer.[32] The prosecution counsel, representing the state of Pennsylvania, was led by Pennsylvania Attorney General Benjamin Champneys and Deputy Attorney General for Lancaster County William Mathiot.[32] Haggerty requested a defense counsel, led by George Ford and John L. Thompson.[32]

Testimonies from witnesses and neighbors at the scene testified of the presence of a demijohn that smelled of whiskey inside Haggerty's bedroom, in efforts to highlight a history of violence when under the influence of alcohol[33][17], as well as claims by the witnesses of Haggerty drinking alcohol in the week prior to the event, when Haggerty claimed he was sober for a week before the murder.[21] The trial heard from 47 witnesses for the prosecution and 24 witnesses for the defense.[17] Two testimonies included the post-mortem analysis of the bodies of Fordney and Tripple by Dr. Geo B. Kerfoot and Dr. Henry Carpenter, describing the murder scene and the dealt inflictions, which was followed by the defense arguing that Haggerty was insane at the time of the attack due to a head fracture sustained from Haggerty's former lumberjack occupation which produced "unnatural excitement".[3] The defense corroborated this event through a retelling of Haggerty's prior criminal history.[34] Another witness was Dr Charles L. Baker, the practicing physician of the prison, who described the discussions he had with Haggerty after the murder, including his delusions and motives, and testified that Haggerty's alcoholism and skull fracture contributed to "excitement of the brain analogous to mania".[7] One witness was a testimony from Dr. William Baker Fahnestock, who declared that a former skull fracture from Haggerty's time as a lumber worker and other phrenological evidence did not impact the motive.[35][3]

In the final instruction to the jury, Lewis repeated the basic facts of the case, and summarized the previous legal and medical precedents regarding insanity in a criminal sense. He referred to the legislation enacted in 1794 for Pennsylvania which specified the different degrees of murder, as well as the then-recent opinion by Chief Justice of the New Jersey Supreme Court Joseph Coerten Hornblower on his aversion on recognition of the insanity defense.[36] Lewis also instructed the jury that Haggerty's delusions over his talking horse and ilk would not classify legal grounds on the insanity defense if it is decided by the jury, but valid as a defense if the jury declared Haggerty suffering from insanity due to the religious delusions that resulted in the murder of Fordney.[36] Lewis presented the argument of withdrawing from alcohol consumption resulting in delirium tremens.[36] In Lewis' summation, he stated that if the jury decides to convict, he is guilty of murder due to the consumption of alcohol beforehand:

If the jury believe that the prisoner committed the act in a fit of insanity, produced by voluntary intoxication, and while under the immediate influence of spirituous liquor, he is nevertheless guilty of murder. The voluntary conversion of himself into a demon, was an unlawful act, for all the immediate consequences of which the law holds him accountable. And although there was no deliberate intention to kill, the law, by construction, holds him to be guilty, of malice aforethought.

— Lewis' summation to the jury.[37]

Lewis stated that the testimonies of the presence of the alcohol in Haggerty's bedroom gives weight to the potentiality that he was under the influence of alcohol despite testimonies of the absence of an alcohol smell, citing "affirmative swearing".[38] Lastly, Lewis argued that the jury is to decide whether the Haggerty was possibly too intoxicated to think rationally and thus be charged with second-degree murder, or that Haggerty retained his faculties despite drinking and instead murdered Fordney based on previous altercations between them, resulting in a charge of first-degree murder.[38][39]

The jury unanimously voted on January 28th, 1847 to convict Haggerty of first-degree murder.[40] Haggerty's defense requested a retrial on the basis of a tainted jury and the possibility of one of the jurors stating Haggerty "ought to be hung" at the scene of the murder.[41] This request was overruled, as the basis of the request was of known comments by the juror prior to being selected as part of the jury, and is thus nullified as the objections were only brought out after the jury voted to convict Haggerty.[42][2] Haggerty was subsequently sentenced to be hanged. Lewis stated to Haggerty that he knew he was not mentally sane and chose to commit the murder due to indifference of human life:

You knew your brain was powder, and, with reckless indifference to human life, if not with deliberate design to work destruction, you applied the match.[43]

Haggerty was later hanged on 23 April 1847.[5] Haggerty's skull was examined by a team of doctors led by Dr Charles L. Baker, who collectively determined the skull fracture used as phrenological evidence in the trial did not exist.[44]

Aftermath[edit]

On 9 February, 1847, immediately after the jury convicted Haggerty, former New York chancellor James Kent published a letter citing agreement with the jury's ruling, stating that he is opposed to an insanity ruling as "pseudo-philanthropists" would "annihilate all crime by resolving it to mal-organization of the brain".[2] Since the trial was conducted, the definition of insanity in terms of crime has been expanded and elaborated.[1] The trial is discussed in summaries of the history of phrenology in the United States.[4][3] A transcript of the trial was published in 1847, and was put into reproduction in 2012 by one of Fordney's descendants, Kenneth T. Fortney. The murder, and subsequently the trial, was also referenced in the 1974 novel Centennial[45], and is predominantly mentioned whenever the history of the Pennsylvania-Kentucky Rifle is alluded to or explained, such as on auctions and museum exhibits for Fordney's rifles[46], or books detailing the long rifle's use and production.[47] The housing of Haggerty has since been demolished, but the former gun shop and residence of Fordney still remains, at 506 and 508 South Queen Street respectively.[17]

Works cited[edit]

  • Lewis, Ellis (17 February 2012). Report of The Trial and Conviction of John Haggerty, for The Murder of Melchoir Fordney, Late of The City of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Gale, Making of Modern Law. ISBN 9781275311367.
  • Eshleman, III, S. Kendrick (2001). "A HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRY IN LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA (Until the year 2000)" (PDF). The Journal of Lancaster County's Historical Society. 103 (3). Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 October 2016. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
  • "The Murder Case, Trial of Haggerty". Lancaster Examiner and Herald, New Series. No. 9. Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, United States: Edward C. Darlington. 27 January 1847. Retrieved 3 January 2024.

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Eshleman 2001, p. 9
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Lewis, Ellis (1848). An Abridgment of the Criminal Law of the United States. Thomas, Cowperthwait & Company. p. 402-412.
  3. ^ a b c d e Thompson, Courtney E. (12 February 2021). "An Organ of Murder: Crime, Violence, and Phrenology in Nineteenth-Century America". Critical Issues in Health and Medicine. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 9781978813083. Retrieved 17 March 2023.
  4. ^ a b Thompson, Courtney E. (25 September 2019). "A Propensity to Murder: Phrenology in Antebellum Medico-Legal Theory and Practice". Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences. 74 (4): 416–439. doi:10.1093/jhmas/jrz055. PMID 31553441. Retrieved 17 March 2023.
  5. ^ a b "U.S.A. Executions - 1607-1976 - Index by name - H-HAP". deathpenaltyusa.org. Retrieved 21 November 2022.
  6. ^ a b c d e Lewis 2012, p. 19
  7. ^ a b Lewis 2012, p. 27
  8. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 43
  9. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 8
  10. ^ J. J., Robbins (1847). "The Pennsylvania Law Journal". Pennsylvania Law Journal. 6 (Old Series), 2 (New Series). Walker: 301–302. LCCN sn92018639. Retrieved 17 March 2023.
  11. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 38
  12. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 42
  13. ^ a b Lewis 2012, p. 45
  14. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 53
  15. ^ "Schreckliche That - ein dreifacher Mord!" [Horrible Act - a triple Murder!]. Der Lecha Patriot und Northampton Demokrat. (in Pennsylvania German). Allentaun, PA. 28 October 1846. p. 3. Retrieved 11 February 2023.
  16. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 26
  17. ^ a b c d e f g Darlington 1847, p. 3
  18. ^ a b c Lewis 2012, p. 50
  19. ^ a b c d e Lewis 2012, p. 20
  20. ^ a b Lewis 2012, p. 9
  21. ^ a b c d Lewis 2012, p. 79
  22. ^ a b c Lewis 2012, p. 5
  23. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 40
  24. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 16
  25. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 12
  26. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 14
  27. ^ a b Lewis 2012, p. 25
  28. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 28
  29. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 29
  30. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 30
  31. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 35
  32. ^ a b c d e Lewis 2012, p. 3
  33. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 52
  34. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 17-19
  35. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 41
  36. ^ a b c Lewis 2012, p. 69
  37. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 70
  38. ^ a b Lewis 2012, p. 71
  39. ^ "Haggerty's Berhör" [Haggerty's Hearing]. Der Lecha Patriot und Northampton Demokrat. (in Pennsylvania German). Allentaun, PA. 9 February 1847. p. 2. Retrieved 11 February 2023.
  40. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 72
  41. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 73
  42. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 78
  43. ^ Lewis 2012, p. 80
  44. ^ Eshleman 2001, p. 8
  45. ^ Michener, James A. (1974). Centennial. Random House. p. 443-444. ISBN 9780394479705.
  46. ^ "Pennsylvania/Kentucky Pistol". Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved 13 February 2023.
  47. ^ Heckert, J. Wayne; Vaughn, Donald (1993). The Pennsylvania-Kentucky Rifle, A Lancaster Legend. Science Press Ephrata.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Trial_of_John_Haggerty&oldid=1207607880"