File talk:Choosing an article.pdf

Sarps 95: This is an interesting and good article. Although, you may want to elaborate on what you are writing. Re-read what you wrote, it is interesting but needs more details. The sources are not a problem. I know you mentioned you had problems finding sources, these are good sources, and very well explained. But, if you can find more that would be great. Apart from that, it is good. Explain what you have, I understand doing research on a female director, who produced and directed two films is tough. But, just elaborate on what you have. Keep up the good work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seaford,_New_York, I chose this article because it is my hometown thus I am very well versed in it, as well, there are a lot of omissions about school sports, and businesses within the town which are well documented and easy to source.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/José_Hernández_(writer) I chose this article as it has a lot of room for improvement, as a fluent spanish speaker i can also use my translation skills to bring information into english as well as have access to a variety of non english sources.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seaford_High_School_(New_York) I chose Seaford High School, as I attended this high school. This page can use a large amount of imporveoements, and there are many sources about this school that this article is not including that i would be happy to add, as well there are no photos and no inclusion of faculty/ extracurriculars.

MikeyLuc1998 (talk) 21:11, 25 September 2016 (UTC) Mikey Lucatorto

Student Reviewer #4

Is there any evidence of plagiarism or copyright violation? If yes, specify… • There does not seem to be any evidence of plagiarism or copyright violation

            o	In the history and chemistry,  try to use more lay language and simplified terms.  Those sections were slightly harder to follow and understand. 

• Try to use mostly updated sources ( some sources from 1990s ects.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lissy5821 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Morgan Peer Review

A noise or sound dose is the amount of sound a person is exposed to in a day. The dose is represented by a percentage. A noise dose of 100% means that a person has exceeded the permissible amount of noise. Any noise exposure after the 100% noise dose may damage hearing.

Add info on exchange rate

Add table — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mashby1228 (talk • contribs) 02:25, 3 December 2018 (UTC)