Talk:Žale

Slovenia Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

Requests: Jože Tisnikar (sl), Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations
Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle
Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
Expand: Education in Slovenia
Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Omar Naber, Radenska
NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band)
Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture
Help assess the quality of 63 unassessed articles
Take/Add requested photographs

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cemeteries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gallery[edit]

Eleassar, I'm afraid I can see no reason whatsoever to have removed the gallery from this article. I think it was a useful addition to the text. Could you explain why you've done this please?

Furthermore, as a general point, it might be a good idea to bring these matters to the talk page before going ahead with your deletion, and please use an informative explanatory edit summary (not just fmt; removed gallery) giving your reasons for such deletions. Many thanks. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 10:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not doing so. You can have a look at Talk:Franja Partisan Hospital where we have discussed a very similar case. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 11:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Right, so let's get this straight, if we may. You don't think there should be galleries at all, even if, as in this case, they only comprise three pictures? Would that be accurate to say?

Franja was not especially similar, as your point there was that there were too many pictures and they cluttered the page up. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 11:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The same in this article: there were too many images and they cluttered the page up. There is no need to include a gallery when all the relevant images can be put more elegantly along the text. Even more, a link to a corresponding gallery in Commons and an external link providing a 3D tour of the cemetery have been provided.

I have taken another look at the images that I admit were probably removed too hastily. The first one is an image of the entrance gate from another angle. There is no need to include two images of the same object. The second and the third one both represent a chapel of the dead; in my opinion one of them is enough. It would be more interesting to add an image of the graves of the cemetery, but I have not found any yet.

Anyhow, the images illustrate only a part of Žale (Central cemetery), called Plečnik Žale cemetery, which is not used for burial itself but for pre-burial ceremonies. It does not seem suitable to me to include so many images of this part in a general article; it may be undue weight. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 12:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. I hardly think it's fair to say "there were too many images and they cluttered the page up". We're discussing three little thumbs at the bottom. However, I really can't be arsed arguing about it, so I'll leave you to decide how many images (or none) there should be on this article. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 14:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Vhodni portal pokopališča Žale.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:08, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]