Talk:102 Not Out

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Please review lead[edit]

To me this does not belong in lead: "When it was announced that Bachchan and Kapoor were coming on-screen again it caused a stir. The reason is that around the time their casting was finalized Rishi Kapoor publicly accused Bachchan of never crediting his costars for his success. Even though this accusation was proven false, as sources show Bachchan writing about his costars in lengthy detail, it caused negative publicity." and not sure if even belongs in this article at all. Would like some consensus before I move or remove.MoviePhan (talk) 04:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

article plot has been significantly reduced, please advise if excessive plot template should be removed. MoviePhan (talk) 13:48, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary#Length showed the plot should be between 400 to 700 words. Microsoft Word says the present plot summary is 407 words. Thanks for the edit! Vivek Ray (talk) 14:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]