Talk:148th Division (People's Republic of China)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 19 April 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 10:05, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


148th Division (People's Republic of China)148th DivisionWP:TWODAB primary per WP:SMALLDETAILS BilledMammal (talk) 02:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). No such user (talk) 13:45, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per NSU. Completely agree. Gonnym (talk) 23:35, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per NSU, per the other similar RM. The Chinese, Japanese and Germans all had a 148th Division that had a rifle/infantry role. WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME is part of the MOS and provides guidance on this. Specifically, it states that pre-emptive disambiguation of similarly named formations is the way to go, and frankly, MILMOS has served Wikipedia well for a lot of years and I see no reason to walk it back. If enough editors disagree, then start a centralised conversation about it at the Village Pump, don't go move formation articles unilaterally or create RMs. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:56, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per NSU. Too generic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.