Talk:1971 Grand Prix (tennis)

Tennis High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennis To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Take an item off the Cleanup listing
Copyedit : Roger Federer, Leander Paes, Rafael Nadal, Justine Henin – to be used as examples for ideal page structures
Expand : Grab a Start article and expand it, or peruse the List of articles.
Photo : Add photos to Tennis or Tennis people articles
Stubs : Bring a Stub up to our standards.
Other : *Sign up as a member of the project.
Tag more articles with our standard project template.
Help with the creation of yearly main articles and drawsheets for every Open Era ATP and WTA tournament.

Disambiguation[edit]

I've been a bit bold, but I've been working on the 1973 Grand Prix and the article looks rather clumsy already - and that's before I've reached the halfway point. This decision will make more sense in the long run when the two disambiguated articles - and future articles in the series - are completed. Totalinarian (talk) 18:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:CONCEPTDAB. Among other things, it says "Where the primary topic of a term is a general topic that can be divided into subtopics, such as chronologically (e.g., History of France) or geographically (e.g., Rugby union in the British Isles), the unqualified title should contain an article about the general topic rather than a disambiguation page." In other words, a topic does not become "ambiguous" just because it can be divided into two or more subtopics. You can split the article into separate parts for organizational purposes, but please don't call it "disambiguation" when you do so. What remains at the original title should be a list or overview article. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]