Talk:1996 Football League First Division play-off final

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1996 Football League First Division play-off final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 11, 2021Good article nomineeListed
May 23, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
January 22, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article

Sources[edit]

Play-offs[edit]

Background[edit]

Leicester top scorer: Iwan Roberts (20 goals; 19 in league, 1 in League Cup)
Leicester second top scorer: Mark Robins (10 goals; 6 in league, 4 in League Cup).
Leicester source: <ref>{{cite book |editor1-first=Glenda |editor1-last=Rollin |editor2-first=Jack |editor2-last=Rollin |title=Rothmans Football Yearbook 1996–97 |year=1996 |publisher=Headline Publishing Group |location=London |isbn=978-0-7472-7781-1 |pages=200–201, 577–581, 602–603}}</ref>
Palace top scorer: Dougie Freedman (20 goals; all in league).
Palace second top scorer: Bruce Dyer (14 goals; 13 in league, 1 in FA Cup).
Palace source: <ref>{{cite book |editor1-first=Glenda |editor1-last=Rollin |editor2-first=Jack |editor2-last=Rollin |title=Rothmans Football Yearbook 1996–97 |year=1996 |publisher=Headline Publishing Group |location=London |isbn=978-0-7472-7781-1 |pages=140–141, 577–581, 602–603}}</ref>

Match[edit]

Post-match[edit]

Statement Quality Predictions[edit]

Hi, Here are a few statements that were flagged as having POV issues by an AI. I'm posting these here for feedback and evaluation of the predictions. The related discussion can be found here. Each example contains the statement that was flagged by the AI as having minor POV issues along with the probability score of the prediction and the five possible words that led to the flagging. Note that all of the words will not be relevant but one of them is expected to be the reason for such flagging. The statements were taken from the article as on 30th November, 2020.

  • In an interview 20 years later, Claridge refuted that he had scored off his shin, claiming "It didn‚Äôt hit my shin, that was a stupid thing to say ..."
Probability: 0.9681972
  • The biggest talking point of extra-time came with just seconds to go; Martin O'Neill sent on his substitute goalkeeper Zeljko Kalac, expecting the 6 ft 7in keeper to be a better bet at saving penalties than Kevin Poole.
Probability: 0.7394836
  • He added that he was "dreading penalties" having converted just one spot kick from six attempts during his career.
Probability: 0.7043451
  • Journeyman Claridge, who had moved to Leicester City from Birmingham City in March, described his winning strike as "the most important goal of [his] life" but admitted that it "went in off [his] shin".
Probability: 0.62054914

Noting that some of the flagged statements are in quotes, but I'm still posting them for feedback and have a conversation if the predictions make sense.

Pinging User:The_Rambling_Man regarding the update. We can discuss if a different format is more helpful after this initial posting. Sumit (talk) 21:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:1996 Football League First Division play-off Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Usernameunique (talk · contribs) 09:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Route to the final

Background

Summary

References

Overall

Usernameunique all addressed/responded to. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 15:35, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Usernameunique anything more needed here? The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 07:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Rambling Man, I just need to read through your responses and edits. I'll take a look now. --Usernameunique (talk) 07:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Rambling Man, looks good, passing now. One question above. Also, take a look at the edit I just made re: reference formatting, and see if you like it—it's a slightly more elegant method, I think. But undo the edit if you don't like it. --Usernameunique (talk) 07:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's fine, thanks. Responded above. Cheers for the review. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 07:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]