Talk:2001 Belgian Grand Prix/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dawnseeker2000 (talk · contribs) 02:34, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

@Dawnseeker2000: Been two weeks since the review was opened and no comments have been left. What is the status of this review? MWright96 (talk) 10:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just got back to work, so I've nothing to say on this one yet. To be even more clear: I am a person with highly-variable energy and when I took these three I was rather energetic. Not so much anymore. Please be patient, or you can request another reviewer. I won't mind. I didn't say I wasn't going to do it, but it will be a little bit. Dawnseeker2000 15:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article is looking good. I'm slowly working my way through it and will mark it as GA when complete. Dawnseeker2000 22:47, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No sense in delaying this any further. It easily meets and exceeds the GA criteria. I'll go ahead and pass it, then continue the minor copy editing. Very nice article. Dawnseeker2000 12:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]