Talk:2005 New Zealand rugby union tour of Britain and Ireland

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rugby union Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article move[edit]

Why was this article moved to a non-standard name? Can you please seek consensus before making such drastic changes. noq (talk) 12:01, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moved back to original name. FruitMonkey (talk) 19:25, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it would easier to find if the name was shorter and a bit less formal, but, i don't mind. JaFa 01 (talk) 02:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PeeJay2K3[edit]

Hey PeeJay2K3, why do you keep changing what I've done? JaFa 01 (talk) 21:42, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article content[edit]

The content of this article is horribly POV, and the tone would be better suited to a magazine than an encyclopaedia. It's obviously written from a Kiwi point of view, so someone needs to go through the article and give it a massive overhaul. – Pee Jay 08:19, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you do it? JaFa 01 (talk) 08:46, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because I have other things that I'd much rather be doing. Honestly, I'm trying to keep track of every single article related to Manchester United F.C. I don't even have all of them on my watchlist, and I'm still swamped. Anyway, you wrote a lot of the content, so I'd say the burden should fall to you. – Pee Jay 17:39, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't if I can, I mean, no matter how I try it will probably still come out with a Kiwi point view, so. JaFa 01 (talk) 21:17, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's really quite simple to write with a neutral point of view. You just need to report the facts, without any comment on how favourable or unfavourable any particular event was to either team. Remember, there are two teams involved in every match, so they both need to be treated with due deference. – Pee Jay 22:50, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to be as neutral as possible. JaFa 01 (talk) 23:32, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.capetimes.co.za/index.php?fSectionId=275&fArticleId=2963606
- In 2005 New Zealand rugby union tour of Britain and Ireland on 2011-05-25 08:03:03, 404 Not Found
- In 2005 New Zealand rugby union tour of Britain and Ireland on 2011-06-12 02:22:51, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]