Talk:2007–08 Primeira Liga

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Portugal Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

"Apito Final" case[edit]

The decisions under this case aren't final...some teams have appeal against the decisions, so just after another decisions actions can be done.... Aritajustino (talk) 12:27, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any news about the Boavista relegation? Did they appeal and if so, how did it turn out? I searched for about an hour or so, but could not find anything on the topic, so help would be welcome. Hockey-holic (talk) 10:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

6 points deduction to champion FC Porto[edit]

Changed from "Porto were deducted 6 points due to bribery of referees..." to "Porto were deducted 6 points due to alleged attempted bribery of referees...".

The quotation itself states "alleged bribery", and the accusation was not for bribery, but for bribery attempt, which are different things. Since the case is not final, the bribery attempt is, at least for now, just an allegation.

Image copyright problem with File:Fcporto.jpg[edit]

The image File:Fcporto.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --11:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incoherence[edit]

If the decision that took Porto 6 points was rejected why didn't they returned Porto those 6 points? And why weren't they taken in the 2003-04 season? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.247.64.141 (talk) 15:10, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's strange. Maybe it was that way because that year was the year of the final decision of the Apito Final. Curiously, it was the season in which they ended with the biggest point difference for the second placed team between the 2003-04 season and this season... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.193.39.131 (talk) 20:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]