Talk:2007 AFL Mark of the Year

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References[edit]

Could some of you footy nuts please add references independent of the AFL as the season progresses? Surely, The Age mentions who won the round in it's roundup of the week or something?

Cheers,Garrie 06:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the newspapers I know don't pulish the weekly nominations but AFL Record does publish the nominations for the round and previous winners weekly. Is that sufficient? I think it is published by the AFL. The actual winner at the hend of the season does get published widely. BartBart 12:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the overall scheme of things, nominees aren't notable. The winners are (only footy tragics can tell you the runner up in 1973 without looking it up. People with good "general knowledge" can tell you the winner in several codes).
AFL Record, if published by the AFL itself, is a primary source. Doesn't The Footy Show talk about the winner of Mark of the Round every week? If you told me it did - I would believe you... the reference for each round would look like:
<ref> {{cite episode |title = [[The AFL Footy Show]] |network =[[Sorry, I don't know]]|city = [[Melbourne]]|series = [[current year]]|airdate= YYYY-MM-DD || transcripturl= http://URL to e-transcript or online video, if available | credits = Presenters: four ex footy players }} </ref>

(just fix the date) Although if they can't show any footage at all then maybe they don't cover "Mark of the Round"? Garrie 22:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All right, given that nobody has provided any secondary references of commentators discussing the merits of any of the nominees - and nobody has refuted my above comment - and the season is over - I am going to remove all of the nominees. I will leave the winners of each round. But really - only the MARK OF THE YEAR really matters not the mark of round 3!Garrie 05:03, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2007 AFL Mark of the Year. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]