Talk:2007 Rugby World Cup knockout stage

Merge with 2007 Rugby World Cup[edit]

This article should probably be merged with the 2007 Rugby World Cup page, instead of being given a page of its own. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 18:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why? There is a separate article for each of the Pools, so why not have one for the knockout stage? - PeeJay 18:38, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, I misinterpreted the article. Upon looking further, I see the need for the creation of this article, and withdraw my suggestion. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 18:58, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Future results?[edit]

"The semi-fianlist are France vs. Australia and South Africa vs. Argentina. With the final being won by South Africa 31- 10 over Australia." -- What the...? Is Wikipedia predicting the future now? -- ironcito 07:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously that was vandalism. The right thing for you to do would have been to remove it, not complain about it here. Nevertheless, I've deleted it myself now. - PeeJay 09:20, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is that is was right at the top and it had survived several edits already, so I checked here before, in case I was missing something. -- ironcito 19:07, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

unneeded subsection[edit]

are the "Loser Semi-final 1 vs Loser Semi-final 2" subsection titles that necessary? --Howard the Duck 18:05, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just following the same style as 2006 FIFA World Cup knockout stage. I mean, I know there is such a thing as over-sectioning, but this is a logical sectioning of the major sections (Quarter-finals, Semi-finals, Bronze final and Final), and if you do it for the quarters and semis but not the bronze final or final, it just looks daft, IMO. - PeeJay 22:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But you don't need them since there's only one matchup. It'll also emphasize that there is only one matchup. It's also awkward to see a section with only one subsection, considering the part before the subsection heading is empty. --Howard the Duck 03:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 2007 Rugby World Cup knockout stage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:54, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]