Talk:2008 Arizona Cardinals season

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Mid-importance).

Bias/POV[edit]

In the section "Week 10: vs. San Francisco 49ers" one of the final sentences says "The 49ers would mount a late comeback drive. Fortunately, Arizona got a goal-line stand as time ran out." The "fortunately" part is a little biased, and sounds like POV. While the main editor of this article may have found it fortunate, I doubt 49er fans and people placing bets against the Cardinals didn't find it so fortunate, lol. I have changed the comment to "The 49ers would mount a late comeback drive, but Arizona made a successful goal-line stand as time ran out."

I also changed "with the season sweep", because the Cardinals swept their other division foes, but there is no comment about that anywhere. It didn't sound like it was completely intended to be biased, but I'd rather just make things as even and non-biased as possible. I've only skimmed over the article, but from what I've read it looks pretty well done. Supergoalie1617 (talk) 23:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]