Talk:2008 Norwegian First Division

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Football: Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Requested move 7 November 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Procedural close Redundant to this ongoing RM. Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Norwegian First Division → 2008 1. divisjon – Norwegian First Division is not the real name of this Norwegian second-tier football league. The correct naming should be YYYY 1. divisjon for all seasons (YYYY = Year). A lower-case "d" is the correct way of writing "1. divisjon". Examples from other countries: 2018 1. deild karla (Iceland), 2017 1. deild (Faroe Islands) and 2018–19 2. Bundesliga (Germany) Reitimwinkl (talk) 12:40, 7 November 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. —usernamekiran(talk) 18:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. B dash (talk) 03:01, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Those other examples were created pretty recently and don't seem to have been the subject of title RM discussions. Can you give some older examples? Do independent reliable English-language sources use the suggested name predominantly? —BarrelProof (talk) 22:22, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support to match 1. divisjon. Number 5 7 12:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The name 1. divisjon barely registers on Google at all. The name of the league itself was set at Norwegian First Division in a 2014 RM on Talk:Norwegian First Division#Request move the talk page until an undiscussed move last October and another undiscussed move this June. I have moved it back. — Amakuru (talk) 23:36, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and fix 1. divisjon back to sensible English title as Amakuru has just done. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:47, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Update: The Norwegian First Division article has been moved to 1. divisjon as the result of an RM, which presumably largely invalidates the opposing comments above. Number 5 7 16:14, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Amakuru and WP:USEENGLISH, and the Norwegian First Division → 1. divisjon move should be redone. In neither discussion is there evidence that reliable English sources uses the divisjon spelling. To the contrary, relevant English sources like soccerway.com use English division[1]]. --В²C ☎ 01:41, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2017 Norwegian First Division which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:49, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Norwegian First Division which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]