Talk:2009 Kids' Choice Awards

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2009 Kids' Choice Awards article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television: Nickelodeon Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Nickelodeon task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Chris Brown/Rihanna Controversy[edit]

Should there be a mention of the fact that there has been much in the area of criticism involving Nickelodeon keeping Chris Brown (and in some complaints, Rihanna) as candidates for awards following the recent assualt firestorm? WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 18:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another controversy to include might be Jack Black saying 'Crap' and the old man helping Cyrus pick out her dress saying she dressed 'like a hooker.' --71.127.0.249 (talk) 10:55, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Slimed[edit]

List of who got slimed would be great.--71.88.100.62 (talk) 11:43, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't Slime Stunts enough? --AussieLegend (talk) 12:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Already listed at Kids' Choice Awards main article. You want more? Ucla90024 (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Could someone fix the vandalism on "Favorite Cartoon" and replace it with the list of nominees and winner? --SailorStarFighter (talk) 17:44, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with it? It appears correct as of now. Ucla90024 (talk) 19:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was fixed almost as soon as I looked at it again. SailorStarFighter (talk) 22:31, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links[edit]

Three of the references in this article are dead as of now and I can't find archived versions. The urls from webcitation.org that were added in this edit do not link to the correct pages so cannot be used. I last checked the sources before making this edit on 21 August, 2009 and as of that edit, the nominees and winners lists accurately reflected the source data. --AussieLegend (talk) 07:49, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]