Talk:2009 Perak constitutional crisis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

What, no more follow-ups? I should had expected something like this from a made-in-M'sia article. - 60.50.245.173 (talk) 08:40, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • People like you are the reason why articles are not finished properly. You expect to be spoon-fed and sit on your bottom waiting for others to work on the articles. This also goes out to people who ask for citations without looking for the references themselves. These are the laziest bastards out there. Roman888 (talk) 14:40, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ain't that the truth. M'sian editors in general are just too poorly educated to grasp proper composition and proofreading. Damn tak apa mentality and all. - Two hundred percent (talk) 12:05, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that the Malaysian Insider is cited A LOT in this article. I understand that the MSM has little in the way of credibility, but would heavy reliance on a single source, even one which is not government controlled, be a detraction to the quality of this article? I'll see if I can add some from The Nut Graph --58.26.44.233 (talk) 03:28, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'One view' and no sources? Screams POV to me. Goodbye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sapphire200182 (talk • contribs) 22:55, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are more citations on this page than on the Malaysia page. What do you mean 'no sources'? ќמшמφטтгמtorque 09:19, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I removed a paragraph that was blatantly POV; it began with the words "One view is that..." and had no sources whatsoever.

Apex court ruled in favor of BN[edit]

[1]

Copyright problem[edit]

‎ This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:50, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

Regarding this series of edits, I have reverted them because they are in violation of WP:NPOV and WP:OR. The act of "Lim Kit Siang declaring that the 'Sultan has no powers to ask Nizar to quit'" is a fact; interpreting it as "Pakatan Rakyat challenge Sultan power to withholding consent dissolution of State Legislative Assembly" is a point of view and original synthesis. I removed the content from the lead because the issue is already covered in the sections below. - Yk3 talk ~ contrib 10:07, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 26 external links on 2009 Perak constitutional crisis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2009_Perak_constitutional_crisis&oldid=1204383700"